Solar Windows, shingles and cladding? The building itself is now the solar panel
and more Canadian companies are starting to offer solar shingles, cladding and Windows as alternatives to tacking traditional solar panels on the roof. Here’s what you need to know about building-integrated photovoltaics.
Canadian companies are starting to make transparent, coloured panels designed to protect the building
When you walk through the sun-filled atrium of the Edmonton Convention Centre or glimpse the dramatic sloped roof of the Varennes Library in suburban Montreal, it’s not obvious these buildings are generating power. After all, neither has traditional solar panels tacked on the roof.
But the semi-transparent skylights of the atrium and the shingles on the sloped roof are more than just protection from the elements — they’re building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV). That is, they’re made of solar panels.
It’s a solution touted by Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, which started selling solar roof tiles in the U.S. in 2017. Since then, a range of made-in-Canada options for different parts of buildings have hit the market — and installations have sprung up across the country showcasing what’s possible.
Here’s a closer look at how BIPV differs from traditional solar panels and why a lot more may be part of the buildings of the future.
What are building-integrated photovoltaics?
While traditional solar panels are attached to buildings, BIPVs are built into the exterior as key elements.
They can be anything exposed to the sun: shingles, Windows, cladding, skylights, pergolas, balcony railings. One company, Toronto-based Mitrex, is even planning to use them to build greenhouses and highway noise barriers.
WATCH | Making solar energy more accessible by integrating panels into building materials
Making solar energy more accessible by integrating panels into building materials
New technology that integrates solar panels into building materials like shingles, siding and Windows is becoming more common and researchers say such products could make solar energy more accessible and affordable.
BIPV systems are like other solar panels in that they generate clean energy that can be used for backup power or sold to the grid. But they need to be designed differently in order to serve other functions, such as keeping out the wind and rain or letting natural light shine in.
Because of that, BIPV panels come in a much wider variety of shapes, sizes, colours and transparencies.
Why might you use BIPV instead of installing traditional solar panels?
They increase the space or area available to generate solar power.
Finding the space to install traditional solar panels can be challenging in places like cities. Meanwhile, There is so much unused glass surface on downtown skyscrapers and building walls and Windows, said Adam Yereniuk, director of operations for Kuby Renewable Energy, the company behind the BIPV installation in the Edmonton Convention Centre, Canada’s largest, with a capacity of 169 kW.
The company also worked on a five-storey residence at Red Deer College that’s covered with solar glass cladding on three sides — 545 panels in all.
BIPVs can simplify installation and potentially save on costs.
PV Technical Services, based in St. George-Brant County, Ont., has been installing traditional solar panels for more than a decade. Co-founder Katherine Zhou said customers started asking why they had to hire one contractor to re-roof their home first and another to install the racks and panels on top — especially since the rooftop penetration required for the panel installation voided the roof warranty.
So the company developed its own solar shingle in 2016. Now, for a cost that Zhou estimates is similar to a metal roof installation, her company can put in solar shingles that both protect the roof from the elements and generate power. That saves a lot of headaches, she said.
They can potentially last longer than traditional building materials.
Andreas Athienitis, a researcher at Concordia University in Montreal who studies BIPV, said that while asphalt shingles typically last about 15 years, solar panels can last 30 years, with only a small decrease in efficiency. (Many solar shingle systems, such as the one from PV Technical Services, are Smart and allow you to monitor and replace individual shingles, if necessary.)
They can potentially generate heat as well as electricity.
At the Varennes Library, outdoor air pulled into the ventilation system is preheated by the solar panels before entering the building (which also has a geothermal heating system), said Athienitis. That also cools the panels, which don’t generate as much power when they’re too hot.
A heat pump can potentially be added to increase the amount of space and water heating the panels can do, and the amount of energy per surface area that the system can provide overall.
They can replace materials with a higher carbon footprint.
Mitrex is a Toronto-based company that makes BIPV cladding and plans to make highway sound barriers. Those are two things that are often made of concrete, which has a higher carbon footprint than glass and silicon BIPV panels.
So we are taking the carbon [out of the] system just by installing it, said company CEO Danial Hadizadeh. Over time, he added, the renewable energy generated by the BIPV panels will offset the emissions used to manufacture them in the first place.
They have a unique look.
BIPV makes a visual statement, said Yereniuk.
If you’ve walked through the Edmonton Convention Centre, you can see firsthand that it creates something stunning that you can’t get with any other standard glass.
Can they produce as much power as traditional solar panels?
Their efficiency depends on the materials used and their transparency. Opaque panels can have an efficiency comparable to traditional solar panels made of the same material.
Transparent or semi-transparent panels are less efficient, since by definition a certain amount of the solar energy passes right through them without being absorbed. Hadizadeh said his company’s semi-transparent panels are about 50 to 75 per cent efficient compared to regular solar panels.
However, because BIPV panels are placed where they best serve their purpose as cladding, Windows, etc., they’re not usually optimized for sun exposure, like traditional panels, and so may generate less power.
Hadizadeh hopes that as architects and developers become familiar with BIPV and understand its potential, they will start to design buildings in a way that we maximize the power of the sun.
Why don’t more buildings have these installed?
Véronique Delisle, project manager and senior BIPV technology specialist at CanmetENERGY, a research centre at Natural Resources Canada, estimates that, taken together, all the BIPV in the country currently has less than one megawatt of power capacity, representing less than one per cent of the distributed photovoltaic market.
There are a number of challenges with BIPV that are typical of an emerging technology:
Lack of availability. Until recently, most installations relied on products imported mainly from Onyx Solar in Spain, and they had to be customized rather than being mass produced.
However, Canadian companies like PV Technical Services and Mitrex are starting to offer access to solar shingles and cladding, respectively, that are locally developed and manufactured.
Zhou said PV Technical Services already has several Canadian installations. Mitrex expects to open a new Toronto factory in July to scale up manufacturing cladding for its first customers, which is expected to be installed by the fall. Kuby Energy, which currently sells Tesla Powerwalls in Canada, plans to sell Tesla’s Solar Roof when it’s available in Canada, which is expected later this year.
Technical and regulatory challenges. BIPV products are regulated both as building materials and electrical materials, so they have to meet two sets of requirements. Hadizadeh said that requires a lot of testing and working with the government to write regulations for a new product.
Athienitis said to encourage adoption of these technologies, building codes need to be modified and governments need to provide the right incentives.
Meanwhile, most tradespeople aren’t familiar with it, and Athienitis said there needs to be more education.
Cost. Right now, it’s quite expensive up front, although the electricity generated over its lifetime should offset that eventually, said Yereniuk. Hadizedah said his goal over the next few years is to lower the cost of Mitrex’s products to the point that they can be offered at no up-front cost to customers — instead, they would pay for the electricity generated over the panels’ lifetime (similar to the way geothermal projects are often funded in condos).
It will definitely take off as more people realize it’s a viable technology, said Yereniuk. The industry is changing very fast and technology is rapidly growing and advancing, and costs are rapidly coming down.
With a file from Alice Hopton
Building-integrated Photovoltaics Market Size, Share Trends Analysis Report By Technology (Crystalline Silicon, Thin Film), By Application (Roof, Glass, Wall, Facade), By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023. 2030
The global building-integrated photovoltaics market size was valued at USD 19.82 billion in 2022 and is expected to exhibit a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.0% from 2023 to 2030. The Rapid expansion of the solar photovoltaic (PV) installation capacities of different countries, coupled with increasing demand for renewable energy sources, is expected to drive the growth of solar panel market across the world. Increased awareness for energy security and self-sufficiency and favorable government legislations, coupled with the unilateral obligation of countries such as Germany, Italy, France, the UK, the U.S., China, Japan, and India to the Kyoto Protocol, designated to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, are also expected to promote the growth of the market in the coming years.
The presence of a consumer base with high disposable income levels and the increasing affinity toward integrated installations in residential and commercial buildings in the country are anticipated to boost the demand for the product in the forecast period. In addition, the growing innovation in the domain is projected to increase the operational efficiency of the product, translating into market growth. The building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) market in the U.S. is likely to be driven by the growing demand for alternate sources of energy. The demand for building-integrated photovoltaics is likely to be fueled by the high need for integrated roof systems in commercial and industrial establishments. Improvements in the manufacturing technology of thin film BIPV modules and the rising efficiency of the product are expected to drive the market over the forecast period.
The government of France offers the highest FiTs for electricity generated through photovoltaic components, which are essentially integrated into buildings. Capacity generated by photovoltaics integrated into building envelopes accounts for a substantial share of the overall accumulated, installed capacity generated by photovoltaics in the country. The country offers high subsidies and benefits pertaining to the use of building integrated photovoltaics in a bid to encourage such installations in the country.
On the basis of technology, the global market has been further divided into crystalline silicon, thin film and others. Crystalline silicon segment led the market and accounted for 71.0% of the global revenue share in 2022. Crystalline silicon cells can be integrated into building roofs by using Smart mounting systems, which replace the sections of the roof while keeping its integrity intact. This type of integration does not account for large investments and provides high efficiency. Another option of integration is the replacement of roof tiles with crystalline silicon cells. In addition, the market witnesses the use of anti-reflective coatings, which aid the capture of solar energy and provide superior efficiency. Crystalline silicon has the highest energy conversion efficiency at present; commercial modules typically convert 13%–21% of the incident sunlight into electricity.
Thin film held a share of 22.15% in the global market in 2022. The thin film BIPV market is expected to witness sustained growth over the forecast period due to Rapid technological advancements leading to the introduction of advanced products. Thin film BIPVs are readily used in case of considerable weight constraints for the building. In such cases, the building envelope is unable to support the weight of crystalline silicon integration, leading to high demand for thin film integrated installation. Thin film is advantageous as it can be used for curved surfaces owing to its superior flexibility
Other technology segment includes advanced integrated photovoltaic manufacturing technologies such as dye sensitized cells (DSC) and organic photovoltaics (BIOPV). The demand is expected to be driven by the superior energy bandgap of organic photovoltaics. Rapid technological advancements have led to a significant increase in the efficiency of organic PVs, which is anticipated to boost their demand over the forecast period.
Roof installation segment led the market and accounted for the largest revenue share of 61.57% in 2022. The roof segment will maintain its lead throughout the forecast period. Photovoltaics integrated with building roofs are known to exhibit efficiency due to improved incidence of light on the roof surface. The segment accounted for the highest market share in 2021 owing to the higher strength and improved aesthetic appeal of integrated roofs and skylights. The demand for building integrated roofs is expected to increase over the forecast period due to the development of superior products.
The market is anticipated to have a steady growth in all segments as the demand for BIPV increases. Superior efficiency of solar walls due to strong incident sunlight is expected to drive the demand for BIPV in walls over the forecast period. Introduction of advanced low-weight solar panels is expected to facilitate the demand for building integrated walls. The development of advanced solutions such as the combination of amorphous silicon transparent glass solar panels with an opaque glazing unit is likely to drive the demand for BIPV in these applications. The use of double- and triple-glazed insulating glass in BIPV walls is also expected to boost the product demand in the forecast period.
BIPV facades experience high demand, primarily in the developed economies that have a well-established electricity distribution system. The demand for integration of photovoltaics with facades is driven by their increasing installation in the commercial sector. Glass integrations are expected to grow on account of high transparency of integrated systems coupled with superior integration of glass and BIPV cells. The development of photovoltaic materials with high absorption is expected to propel the product demand over the forecast period.
Others application segment includes shading and membranes. The demand for such products is high in residential installations due to the development of lightweight materials for use in uneven surfaces. The installations do not generally use crystalline silicon photovoltaic module, as the structure is incapable of supporting heavy weight.
Industrial segment led the market in 2022 and accounted for 40.31% of market share. The demand for building-integrated photovoltaics in industrial applications is expected to be fueled by their growing usage to reduce reliance on non-renewable energy sources. The segment is anticipated to expand in the wake of commercial building in the European region. In addition, companies in developed economies in Europe exhibit an increased tendency toward the use of integrated photovoltaics in a bid to improve the aesthetic appeal of buildings.
The demand for building-integrated photovoltaics in commercial establishments is likely to be fueled by the growing number of retrofit projects using these installations. The high emphasis on the aesthetic appeal of solar energy-harnessing systems, primarily in commercial establishments, is likely to fuel the product demand in this sector.
The demand for building-integrated photovoltaics in residential sector is expected to be driven in the forecast period owing to increasing awareness regarding the use of renewable sources of energy for electricity generation among the consumers. However, high cost of integration of photovoltaics into the building envelope is expected to act as a restraint for the market growth over the forecast period.
Europe dominated the global market in 2022 and accounted for the largest revenue share of over 37.42%.Favorable outlook toward renewable energy coupled with consumer awareness for the same in European countries is likely to drive the market for BIPV over the forecast period. Germany and Italy are increasingly emphasizing the use of solar energy, which is expected to translate into higher adoption of BIPV, thus promoting industry growth in the forecast period.
The demand for building-integrated photovoltaics in the North America region is anticipated to grow on account of the rising adoption of aesthetically appealing solar energy-harnessing systems. In addition, the high disposable incomes of consumers in the region, primarily the U.S. and Canada, and the advances in the production technologies of BIPV solar panels are likely to lead to an increased demand for the product over the next seven years. the demand for the product is anticipated to remain high in economies such as China and Japan owing to the increasing efforts by governments to adopt these solutions. Consumers in the region exhibit a high demand for renewable energy sources in order to reduce the impact of non-renewable energy sources on the environment.
The burgeoning building construction industry in the Central and South America is estimated to drive the market over the forecast period. In addition, the demand for BIPV systems in the region is predicted to increase due to their application in the industrial and commercial sectors. Furthermore, the market in CSA, primarily in Brazil and Argentina, witnesses’ high potential due to the increased installation of solar energy-harnessing systems.
Key Companies Market Share Insights
BIPV manufacturers have been implementing various strategies such as new product developments, partnerships, joint ventures, agreements, and collaborations, among others, to maximize their market penetration and to cater to the changing requirements of the architects and construction contractors. For instance, Hanergy Thin Film Power Group partnered with CSR Group to launch thin film flat SOLARtile, which is used as a roof application in building photovoltaics. First Solar, Inc. announced to invest USD 684 million in a new, fully vertically integrated photovoltaic (PV) thin film solar module manufacturing facility in Tamil Nadu, India. Some of the prominent players operating in the global building-integrated photovoltaics market include:
- Hanergy Mobile Energy Holding Group Limited
- AGC Inc.
- The Solaria Corporation
- Heliatek GmbH
- Ertex Solar
- Onyx Solar Group LLC
- NanoPV Solar Inc.
- Polysolar Ltd
Building-integrated Photovoltaics Market Report Scope
Market size value in 2023
Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Moves from the Niche to the Mass Market
The majority of photovoltaic (PV) systems in Germany are roof-mounted using a mounting system to fix the modules. On the other hand, solar PV modules that are fully integrated into the façade or roof offer many advantages to the building owner. Presently a global mass market is developing for photovoltaic building envelopes, allowing cities, in particular, to develop a more sustainable energy consumption.
Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE have made recommendations as to how European manufacturers can participate more successfully in this market. Key facets are the industrial production of custom-made solar components for buildings as well as the incorporation of these components in the planning tools and processes of building specialists. On March 18-19, 2019, the BIPV Forum is meeting in Bad Staffelstein, directly prior to the PV Symposium held there annually.
About 75 percent of all solar PV systems in Germany are roof-mounted, and 25 percent are installed in open areas. The share of building-integrated solar modules, or BIPV, is still rather small, which is quite astounding. Building-integrated modules not only supply electricity, but also function as noise barrier, insulation and provide protection against wind and weather. Additionally, photovoltaic systems integrated into transparent building areas can provide shade and daylight.
Support for the increased use of solar in the building envelope is provided currently by policy makers. As of 2021, an EU Directive requiring all new buildings to have a nearly zero annual energy balance goes into effect. The German government has set a target to realize a climate-neutral building stock by 2050. Against this backdrop, BIPV could be increasingly implemented by architects and planners, thus promoting large area utilization of PV on buildings with a high user acceptance.
Photovoltaic Building Components: Multiple Advantages for Building Owners
Vertically integrated PV modules make use of the low-lying winter sun particularly well. Depending on the orientation, peak yield for vertical installations does not occur at midday, as for most roof-mounted systems, but rather in the morning or afternoon, This opens up the possibility that a complementary battery system installed to increase self-consumption may be sized smaller. Also, snow cover does not present a yield risk. Not least, aesthetics speak in favor of building-integrated photovoltaics: With photovoltaic modules, it is possible to create partly transparent glazing or translucent elements in different colors.
In particular, cities with a large building stock could benefit greatly from the technology, helping to close the gap between renewable energy use in rural and urban areas. Big buildings are excellently suited for BIPV, since multi-story buildings have large façades among other things. Although building-integrated photovoltaics is more expensive than other types of building envelopes, the additional costs are reduced appreciably if a renovation or new envelope is necessary anyway. A payback time of about ten years for the additional costs is possible in the meanwhile.
Only Ten Percent of the PV-suitable Area on Buildings Is Needed for a Successful Energy Transformation
Although detailed analyses are still necessary, it is already evident that there is more than sufficient building area suitable for photovoltaics. The available area is even higher than previously thought. A doctoral thesis from 2017, carried out at the Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) and Fraunhofer ISE, found that the building area suitable for PV in Germany is more than five-fold the area required for PV in an energy system based completely on renewables. Up to now, the figures known to experts indicate that the total available roof and façade area correspond to an installed photovoltaic capacity of up to 2000 GW. According to calculations at Fraunhofer ISE, a successful energy transformation in Germany requires between 150 and 300 GW installed PV (depending on the boundary conditions) for a successful energy transformation.
Individual Products, Industrial Manufacturing and a Secure Value Chain on the National Level
A small, established market for building-integrated PV modules already exists. Small and medium-size businesses produce modules that address the specific needs of their customers. At an annual production of 10 to 50 megawatt-peak, however, production is still too small to make a relevant contribution to the mass market. On the other hand, mass-produced standardized BIPV modules could make a larger contribution, and this market is emerging. Already today, increasingly large businesses are meeting the rising demand. Since their production capacity is up to ten times greater, their products cost significantly less.
Researchers at Fraunhofer ISE see a big chance for European companies in custommade BIPV modules that are industrially produced in comparable magnitude. “Building integrated modules manufactured according to the customer’s specifications enable a sustainable value chain, since products of uniform size and standard design often cannot be used by architects,” says Dr. Tilmann Kuhn, Head of the Solar Building Envelopes Group at Fraunhofer ISE. “Due to the close ties with the building process and the individual manufacture based on customer specifications, a migration of production abroad is not a threat for this industry,” adds the Institute Director Dr. Andreas Bett. “Building-integrated photovoltaics not only holds a chance for expanding the capacity of renewable energy in the built environment, but it also opens up a market for European photovoltaic production.”
Fraunhofer ISE has already developed many operational BIPV prototypes with various cell and module formats and different design options. The selection is large: The building envelopes are semi-transparent with visible silicon solar cells or opaque in different colors. Concepts for highly automated production lines for customized modules are also in the drawer, and enable automated production also in small production capacities. The successful manufacture of multiple-pane insulating glazing is one piece of evidence that individual, custom-made building elements can be successfully produced in Germany. Companies with several production lines distributed throughout Germany produce over two million square meters annually. Customer proximity and the individuality of the products strengthen the domestic market.
Incorporating Solar Products into the Building Planning Process
In order to stimulate the mass market, BIPV products must be integrated into all phases of the building process. This includes the planning, construction, operation and maintenance. Planners and architects must be able to use solar building components easily in their daily work, in the best case with just a few clicks. Only in this way can a niche product evolve into a mass market product. Digital planning tools play a key role here. Therefore, building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) shall be prominently available in Building Information Modeling (BIM), a software-based method for the databaseoptimized planning, operation and management of buildings and other structures.
In the SolConPro project and in the SCOPE project, initiated in 2018, Fraunhofer ISE works with partners from the building industry and information technology precisely on this topic. In the future, a planer looking for a façade shall be able to find a solar façade just as easily as a conventional façade or other building component, using BIM tools. Not only could this development breathe new life into the European solar industry but also bring some movement into the stagnating energy transformation.
On March 19, 2019 Dr. Tilmann Kuhn will give a talk on “Innovations and Future Developments in BIPV” at the BIPV Forum in Bad Staffelstein.
Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Moves from the Niche to the Mass Market glassonweb.com
Current prospects of building-integrated solar PV systems and the application of bifacial PVs
Zuher R. Khalifa Abojela 1,2. Mohd Khairunaz Mat Desa 2 and Ahmad H. Sabry 3
- 1 Department of Electrical and electronics, College of Engineering, Sabratha University, Sabratha, Libya
- 2 School of Electrical and Electronics, USM Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
- 3 Department of Computer Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq
Building-integrated solar photovoltaic (BIPV) systems have gained attention in current years as a way to recover the building’s thermal comfort and generate sustainable energy in building structures. BIPV systems can provide shade against sunshine while generating ancillary electrical power. Over the last decades, engineers have been trying to improve the efficiency of BIPV systems. BIPV systems with various installation types, including rooftop, balcony, curtain, sunshade, and wall façade types, are being constantly researched and intensively presented for improving power efficiency and reducing air-conditioning use. This work provides an overview of solar BIPV systems and focuses particularly on existing applications of the bifacial type of BIPV systems. The motivation and an overview of BIPV systems are first introduced, followed by the study methodology considered and the contributions. This work discusses PV technologies of bifacial PVs (monocrystalline and polycrystalline bifacial modules), BIPV installation [curtains, rooftop, flat rooftop, transparent faced, balcony Windows (transparent), wall opaque facade, flat roof-faced, and skylight sunshade types], simulation and optimization software (simulation software and future trends), zero-energy BIPV technology, and optimization techniques of BIPV systems. Last, suggestion amendments to the current BIPV design that possibly contribute to growing the system’s effectiveness, reliability, and cost as future design theories for the whole system are presented.
1.1 An overview and motivations
One of the main promising tools for generating electricity is the photovoltaic (PV) system. PV power plants can potentially replace fossil fuel-based electric power plants, which produce huge amounts of greenhouse emissions. However, the PV power plant needs a sizable amount of land area in order to create the same quantity of power due to its efficiency being poorer than a typical power plant. The idea of producing power with less pollution is growing more and more appealing as environmental concerns and interest in environmental issues rise. Solar photovoltaic energy uses free fuel, unlike traditional generation techniques. Furthermore, as a grid-connected PV application, solar photovoltaic energy systems can be simply installed on the roof of residential buildings and on the wall of business structures to generate power without creating any pollution. Solar photovoltaic energy provides a way to power isolated towns and establishments that are inaccessible to electricity companies, in addition to grid-connected PV systems (Zahedi, 2006).
Solar photovoltaic energy is becoming more popular all around the world. Today, solar PV systems totaling more than 3,500 MW have been built worldwide. The cost of PV systems has steadily declined since 1970 (Peters et al., 2019). The use of small-scale residential PV systems has been encouraged worldwide as a result of this price decline. Recent events have prompted environmental experts to launch substantial research initiatives for using renewable energy sources, such as solar energy. The use of solar photovoltaic energy as source of power is being taken more seriously, which bodes well for the future of this technology. This contribution’s goal is to present the most recent advancements in solar photovoltaic energy systems (Klenk, 2018).
One of the new strategies to sustain renewable energy in the residential sector is by employing solar power-generating devices or systems known as building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPVs) that are smoothly incorporated into the building envelope and are included in building elements, such as Windows, roofs, or façades. BIPV systems, which install PV modules that are integrated into the building envelope, have gained popularity in recent years. They reduce the need for building resources since they make it possible to produce renewable energy locally, and they can replace traditional construction components.
BIPV systems have the dual benefits of boosting the potential for renewable energy in the built environment and delivering cost and time savings during construction by displacing conventional building components. BIPVs must deal with the complex challenges of transmission and distribution losses (Reddy, 2020). Therefore, one of the holistic strategies that lessen the need for such enormous land expanses is the incorporation of PV-covered buildings. The Energy Performance of Buildings is the primary legal tool to enhance the energy performance of buildings, along with the Energy Efficiency Directive (Sabry et al., 2017; Tina, 2020). This means that going forward, new structures must achieve the goal of being almost entirely energy-free.
BIPV systems may include shades, rooftops, building awnings, and building facade walls to block sunlight while simultaneously producing auxiliary electrical energy. Recent advancements in PV technology have produced semi-transparent PV modules, such as thin-film solar panels and bifacial silicon solar panels, allowing some amount of light and transparency. This makes the BIPV system applicable to skylight applications, Windows, and attractive building facades as it allows a good amount of daylight for a building. Thus, BIPV Windows have the advantage of simultaneously producing electricity, reducing the amount of energy needed for building cooling or heating and allowing lighting (Wang et al., 2017).
1.2 Research highlights
This paper’s scope is to thoroughly evaluate the integration viability of solar PVs with the building envelope, the annual energy yield, and the electrical energy optimization techniques at the residential building level and techniques to provide accessibility of PV energy injection into the grid. A comparison of this work with other review articles in the literature is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1. Comparison of this work with other review articles in the literature.
The main contributions can be reviewed as follows:
Presenting a general overview of integrating buildings with solar PVs and focusing particularly on the existing and potential applications of bifacial PV types in BIPV systems.
Discussing the current prospects of using bifacial modules within the industry of PV technology.
Providing an overview of the significant findings of the existing bifacial BIPV systems in terms of efficiency calculations, annual energy yields, energy savings, and financial benefits.
Presenting a clear understanding of the BIPV and bifacial BIPV frameworks that allow to evaluate such systems.
Providing a comprehensive assessment of the prospects of building-integrated bifacial solar PV systems in terms of installation types for strengthening BIPV systems.
Discussing the potential use of power optimization techniques for improving bifacial BIPV systems. Furthermore, a comparison between the optimization-based normal PV technology and bifacial PV optimization strategies is also discussed.
Classification of BIPV installation
BIPV systems are installed on structures that use the energy they generate, making them neutral systems with the least negative environmental impact. The photovoltaic elements built into a building’s envelope (BIPVs) interact with the building in various ways, affecting its laws, standards, safety, performance, maintenance, environmental concerns, durability, design, and constructability (Abdallah et al., 2013; Abdelhafez, 2021). The main components of BIPV systems can be categorized depending on their solar module types, methods of grid connections, intended uses, or applications.
A BIPV system may consist of a grid-connected system, a stand-alone system, or a hybrid system. Energy is produced and delivered where it is needed via a BIPV system. It can also supply energy on demand with the help of an energy storage system (ESS). Therefore, this work classifies the BIPV system as a whole categorization structure, including the simulation and optimization, as shown in Figure 1. Most of the studies presented in this diagram will be explained in detail in the following sections of this research.
FIGURE 1. Classification of BIPV systems.
2.1 PV technologies
Scientists at Bell Laboratories were the first to make use of the phenomenon of photon energy being converted into electricity. They produced a functional silicon solar cell that produced an electric current when exposed to sunshine in 1954. Eventually, solar cells were used to power spaceships, clocks, computers, and other devices. To assist in powering the electric grid, solar systems are now being constructed on a large scale. Solar-powered electricity is now widely available and economically viable. The majorities of solar cells on the market today are silicon-based and offer competitive costs and high efficiency (the rate at which the solar cell converts sunlight into electricity). To produce massive, utility-scale systems, these cells are typically put together into bigger modules that may be mounted on the rooftops of homes or businesses or used with ground-based racks.
The materials of PV module types are classified as follows:
Si: than 90% of modern PV systems use modules made of crystalline silicon. The modules’ architecture can vary in minor, yet significant, ways. Due to the widespread usage of crystalline silicon modules, other types of modules may exhibit differences in module designs, but to better follow the development of technology, crystalline silicon module types are divided as detailed in the following text.
Perovskite: these modules are built of materials having the perovskite structure, commonly abbreviated as ABX3, where A denotes an organic or inorganic cation (for example, methylammonium), B denotes a metal cation (generally Pb2), and X denotes a halide (for example, I- and/or Br-). A hybrid organic–inorganic methylammonium lead halide perovskite is the name given to the structure that is most frequently used. CaTiO3’s crystal structure serves as a representation of the overall perovskite structure.
OPV (organic photovoltaic technology): bulk hetero-junction modules made of organic and/or polymeric small molecules are used in the majority of OPV technologies. The separation of the photo-induced exciton into free electrons and holes that produce photocurrent is made easier by the bulk hetero-junction concept.
III–V: these modules make use of elements from the periodic table’s third and fifth columns. Several of these reports are for stacks of multiple layers, often known as multi-junctions, because these materials can be composed of a wide range of Band gaps. Because their lattice constants are so comparable, germanium and gallium arsenides are frequently produced together. Modules containing germanium are categorized under this heading for convenience.
Hybrid: these courses incorporate content from various categories. It consists mostly of a silicon and III–V module combination. In the future, modules manufactured from other material combinations, such as perovskites, may also fall under this category.
Dye-sensitized: typically, these modules use a porous titanium dioxide matrix coating with a skinny layer of robustly gripping dye. The color absorbs the photocarriers (excitons), and the light is divided at the interface between an electrolyte and titanium oxide, specifically penetrating the titania.
Chalcogenide: it is a material that has no less than one part of the sixth column of the cyclic table, such as tellurides, selenides, and sulfides. The majority familiar of these are copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and CdTe.
Amorphous silicon: this contains thin-film silicon modules with single, two, and three junctions and is grown on glass or other low-cost sub-materials. Several multi-junction masses include alloys with some partially crystallized and germanium layers to aid get layers with a lesser Band gap.
For a variety of photovoltaic systems, from 1988 to the present, the greatest confirmed conversion efficiencies for Champion modules are maintained by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in a graph. A figure expressing the Champion efficiency of PV modules is shown in Figure 2.
2.1.1 Monocrystalline and bifacial modules
Monocrystalline solar modules, also known as single-crystal modules, are made of silicon that is cut from a single big crystal. This indicates that the interior structure is very well-ordered and that electrons may travel through it with ease. A rod is progressively drawn up out of a pool of molten silicon to form the silicon crystals. A long, cylindrical crystal will form at the end of the rod as it departs under carefully monitored conditions. After that, the column is thinly cut into pieces for the solar modules. Before crystallizing, molten silicon is combined with substances that allow it to display n-type or p-type characteristics (Enaganti et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021). The void where the edge of the crystal column was in the corners of monocrystalline solar modules can be used to identify them. Due to the crystals’ constant orientation, each module will also have a consistent pattern. Although monocrystalline silicon solar modules are the most effective, they are also the priciest due to the technology required to produce their massive, very uniform silicon crystals.
Monocrystalline solar panels are more expensive than polycrystalline solar panels, but this does not necessarily imply that they are not the ideal choice. The silicon structure is the key determinant of the price difference between these two types of solar panels. Manufacturers pour molten silicon into square molds to create polycrystalline panels and then separate the resulting wafers into individual modules. Contrarily, the meticulous control of silicon solidification during the production of monocrystalline panels requires a more complicated procedure, which drives up the cost of single-crystal solar modules. Monocrystalline solar panels are more expensive when comparing the costs of the two types of panels. However, both systems have the same price for inverters, wiring, electrical safety measures, racking, and labor. Additionally, if there is just a little amount of space for a solar panel installation, it is of note that monocrystalline panels may provide a better return on the investment due to their higher efficiency. Finally, it should be noted that the federal solar tax credit is still available for both varieties of solar panels. Monocrystalline silicon bifacial modules are composed of cells that usually refer to as silicon cells. As the name suggests, the entire volume of the cell is made up of a single silicon crystal. It is the cell type whose commercial application is currently more pervasive. Using silicon single crystals, a monocrystalline solar cell is created using the Czochralski process. The monocrystalline structure’s efficiency ranges from 15% to 20%. It is built of silicon ingots and has a cylindrical shape. To maximize performance, the cylindrical ingots’ four laterals are carved out to accommodate silicon wafers (Fang et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2021). A low-cost industrialized screen printing method that produces bifacial solar cells on CZ monocrystalline substrates was presented by Yang (2011). Additionally, new advancements in this field of study have been made (Janßen, 2009; Yan et al., 2019). The metallization, boron-diffused surface passivation, and BBr3 boron diffusion are the main difficulties with screen-printed CZ bifacial solar cells. A modification of the boron diffusion conditions to reach crucial cell physical properties required for bifacial operation was made by Monokroussos et al. (2020).
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory measured the spectral response of a representative monocrystalline Atonometrics silicon PV reference cell for the study (Gostein et al., 2020). By averaging the calculated spectral reaction curves for the six commercially existing bifacial PV modules reported by Zhang et al. (2020), typical spectral responses from the back and front sides of bifacial PV modules were obtained. To obtain reflectivity R(λ) for each ground material, the study simulated nine distinct ground-surface resources using spectral reflectivity records found in SMARTS modeling software. Figure 3A shows the spectral reflectivities for all equipment.
FIGURE 3. (A) Reflectivity R (λ) for nine different earth surfaces based on the “SMARTS” dataset (Gostein et al., 2020), (B) monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon solar modules (China P-type Monocrystalline Bifacial Solar Module LYGF-BP72P factory and suppliers | Linyang, 2023), and (C) polycrystalline panel bifacial PV with 144 cells.
2.1.2 Polycrystalline and bifacial modules
In conclusion, monocrystalline solar panels often have better efficiencies and include black solar modules built of a single silicon crystal, but the cost of these panels is frequently higher. Multiple silicon crystals that have been fused to form blue solar cells are used in polycrystalline panels. These panels cost less but are frequently less effective. Both mono and poly solar systems will reduce electricity costs. The best financing plan, space considerations, and personal preference are the deciding factors. The purpose of both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar modules in a solar PV system as a whole is the same, and the knowledge following it is simple: they equally take solar power and convert it to electrical energy. Additionally, they are both formed of silicon, which is a plentiful and incredibly robust element used in solar panels. Numerous companies produce both monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels. Both polycrystalline and monocrystalline solar panels can be exceptional options for buildings, but before making the final solar purchasing decision, one should be conscious of numerous significant features. The type of silicon solar module that both of the two technologies use makes the main distinction between them: monocrystalline solar panels use silicon solar modules made from a single silicon crystal, whereas polycrystalline solar panels use silicon solar modules prepared from a lot of silicon fragments that have been melted jointly. Monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon solar modules are shown in Figure 3B.
The color of the two types of solar panels is what distinguishes them most visibly from one another in terms of appearance: monocrystalline panels are often black, but polycrystalline panels might have a blueish tint to them. The longevity of the solar panels is mostly unaffected by the sort of silicon module that makes them up. For at least 25 years, monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels will both produce power with efficiency. Similar to efficiency, monocrystalline solar panels often perform better than polycrystalline ones in terms of temperature coefficient. It follows that monocrystalline solar panels work better in high temperatures as a panel’s temperature coefficient is simply a measure of how well it performs in warm temperatures (with percentages closer to zero being better) (Sabry et al., 2018). A comparison between monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules on the important key metrics is listed in Table 2.
TABLE 2. Comparison between monocrystalline and polycrystalline modules on the important key metrics.
In the Atacama Desert, a research station for photovoltaics was set up for 8 months under high outdoor irradiation circumstances (Ayala et al., 2018). At a weather station, four IV tracers were attached to monocrystalline, polycrystalline, thin-film, and bifacial modules; two IV tracers were also connected to two PV modules, in order to analyze the soiling phenomenon. Thin-film technology has a performance ratio of 90%, polycrystalline technology of 88%, monocrystalline technology of 78%, and bifacial technology of 96% when just the nominal power of the front face is assumed. After finding a natural cleaning effect caused by high humidity, which frequently happens in the early morning, the soiling ratio was kept at 0.94 and 0.01 for the next 2 months. During the first 2 months, the soiling ratio decreased by less than 2.5%. The PV module reconfigurations using copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and polycrystalline PV technology have been examined in the study (Ul-Haq et al., 2020). This report also includes a thorough quantification of the effects of the investigated PV problems on the electricity system. According to the MATLAB/Simulink data, CIGS PV technology outperforms polycrystalline in terms of power output under various fault scenarios. The given results make it clear that optimum PV array reconfiguration can boost energy optimization from PV systems with fewer PV peaks. Consequently, this will result in better PV system performance. A polycrystalline panel bifacial PV with 144 cells is shown in Figure 3C.
The energy yield of such technology can be boosted by up to 30% when combined with the state-of-the-art PANDA n-type crystalline silicon solar cells, which awaken earlier and go to sleep later than traditional p-type solar cells. Electrical structures with series and parallel connections and multiple busbar half cells can lower CTM loss and boost module output power.
2.2 BIPV applications
BIPV systems are composed of PV modules that are used to be integrated with energy-sustainable building skins. This includes rooftops, balconies, curtains, sunshades, and wall types to generate power from direct sunlight, reflected sunlight, and diffusion irradiation. Such systems provide buildings with the ability to perform two tasks. BIPV systems should, first and foremost, meet the standards of traditional building envelope materials, including acceptable structural strength, thermal insulation, weather protection, and noise protection. This is because they serve as the skins for the buildings. Second, BIPV systems produce electricity and serve as a building’s power source (Huang and Hewitt, 2020; Kurian and Karthi, 2021).
BIPV modules now on the market are either based on copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) (Ritzen, 2019), cadmium telluride (CdTe) (Sabry et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2020), thin-film technologies like amorphous silicon (a-Si) (Dai et al., 2021), or crystalline silicon solar modules (c-Si) (Santoyo-Castelazo et al., 2021). With most technologies, semi-transparency can be accomplished, for example, in curtain wall or skylight applications, by either spacing opaque c-Si solar modules or making the thin-film layer transparent. However, when transparency rises, the module’s efficiency falls as less sunlight is absorbed by the photovoltaic layer and used to generate power. Ritzen (2019) developed a life-cycle assessment for BIPV configurations on three types of PV technologies, namely, copper indium gallium (di) selenide (CIGS), amorf-Si, and multi-Si, in three types of rooftop BIPV arrangements, that is, ventilated with bamboo construction, ventilated with aluminum construction, and non-ventilated. This evaluation was applied to three scenarios: circulation, recycling, and reusing. The obtained results demonstrated that the assessment of 100% recycling, 1 square meter of amorf-Si non-ventilated configuration shows the lowest ecological impacts.
Sun et al. (2020) discussed the performance of combining thin-film semi-transparent cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV modules with 50% and 10% transparency and PV crystalline silicon type as a south-facing window. The results demonstrated that the window with 10% transparency of CdTeSemi-transparent PV is able to improve the performance of working PV hours in the range between 500 and 2,000 irradiance, which can efficiently decrease the opportunity of glare. Dai et al. (2021) investigated a flexible thin-film amorphous silicon (a-Si) PV module with BIPV development over a sunlight irradiance between 200 and 1,000 W/m 2. The study covered solar PV parameters such as the open-circuit voltage of the adopted a-Si PV module, which was reduced by approximately 0.40% linearly with an increase of 1°C until a temperature of 91.5°C maximum as compared with the PV organic integrated that decreases to 0.12% with 1°C increase until 78°C.
For the application of multi-crystalline silicon module integration in buildings, Santoyo-Castelazo et al. (2021) installed a solar PV system with a capacity of 12 modules (3 kWp) with 20° southward tilt and an inverter of 2.5 kW. This system produces 1,282 kWh/kWp on average annually at a performance factor of 0.75. Three traditional photovoltaic generation systems based on various technologies were contrasted with the multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system evaluated in this study (the copper–indium–selenium solar modules, the amorphous silicon, and the single-crystalline silicon). The results demonstrated that the life-cycle evaluation of multi-crystalline silicon modules, as compared to other systems, contributes more pollutants throughout their lifetimes and nearly always has lower environmental burdens across the majority of impact categories (six out of eleven).
The BIPV peel serves both as an architectural language element for a building and its waterproof barrier. The exploration of high-performance façade products and technologies, such as PV materials, by developers and architects is prompted by stricter building requirements and regulations regarding green sustainability and architecture. BIPVs are a component of construction systems, as opposed to typical PV applications, when taking into account the context of installation, production sequence, jointing, construction, and materials (Adamovic et al., 2017). PV modules have significantly improved in terms of performance, form, and color to fit diverse building PV peel alternatives because architects need a significant amount of design freedom concerning technology solutions for the customization of building skin (Hemmerle, 2017).
In addition to the BIPV module serving as building skin, it also can provide a component of the construction system and can take the place of traditional building elements. With the aid of conventional construction materials, BIPV systems eliminate the need for heat transfer through the building envelope (Oliveira et al., 2021). BIPV systems are often divided into three categories: roofs (modules on a lightweight substrate or transparent laminates for flat roofs, modules with integrated solar modules as roof covering elements, solar laminates, photovoltaic roof shingles, photovoltaic roof tiles, etc.) (D’Orazio et al., 2013), façades (BIPV cladding walls and curtain walls), and accessories (BIPV shading devices and balconies). Common categories of BIPV systems are shown in Figure 4, while the references according to the classification of BIPV installation type are listed in the following subsections.
FIGURE 4. Common categories of BIPV installation types.
2.2.1 Curtain installation
Martín-Chivelet et al. (2022) used BIPV curtain walls and rain screens to evaluate two steady-state PV module temperature models. To cover the mounting configurations under examination, the experimental setups positioned the BIPV modules perpendicularly and with various rear border circumstances. Four separate metrics, coefficient of determination, mean bias error, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, were used to compare actual and simulated temperatures over an entire year as the experimental base for evaluating each model. The evaluation revealed that the Ross model is most suited for forecasting the annual PV energy in applications such as rain screens and curtain walls. In the same context, BIPV curtain walls were analyzed, tested, and designed, their application potential was determined, and improvements and suggestions were proposed by Li et al. (2021). It can significantly increase PV module efficiency and offer a more consistent interior lighting environment. According to the real-time findings, the BIPV curtain system’s transmittance reaches 9.1% in clear weather. Winter had the highest generating efficiency of the BIPV curtain system (26.5%), followed by autumn and summer separately. Additionally, the BIPV curtain system may meet the needs of building insulation and produce a more consistent indoor lighting environment.
Techniques for thermal improvement, such as a newly developed flow deflector, semi-transparent PV technology rather than opaque PV technology, and multiple inlets, were assessed by Rounis et al. (2021). According to their test results, thermal efficiency could reach 33%. Behind the PV panel, a multiple-inlet layout helped by a flow deflector was found to improve thermal performance by up to 16% and decrease peak PV temperatures by 3.5°C, with only a slight improvement in electrical efficiency. A more extended approach is required for the modeling of convective events in BIPV systems because the recorded Nusselt numbers were found to have poor or marginal agreement with the formulations reported in the pertinent literature. Lai and Hokoi (2017) developed ventilated BIPV curtain walls that can autonomously adjust an environment using buoyant force by integrating a PV system, a double-skin construction, and a thermal flow mechanism. Computational fluid dynamics and full-scale experimental simulations were conducted to investigate the thermal performance of the ventilated BIPV curtain walls and the flow pattern characteristics for the channel airflow under various heating conditions, wall thicknesses, and types of openings. While keeping appropriate wall thermal performance, the created ventilated BIPV curtain walls successfully reduced their solar heat gain. Huang et al. (2018) provided a thorough analysis of a unique vacuum photovoltaic insulated glass unit’s thermal and electrical performance. The comparative investigation demonstrates the superior thermal insulation capabilities of vacuum photovoltaic, which can reduce heat gain and loss in Harbin (HB) and Hong Kong (HK) by up to 81.63% and 75.03%, respectively. In various climatic situations, net energy savings of between 37.79% and 39.82% can be attained by installing vacuum photovoltaic systems in all of the prototype building’s available facades.
2.2.2 Rooftop installation (opaque)
Installing bifacial solar panels on the flat rooftops of commercial buildings is a good approach to increase production. The bifacial gain is largely determined by the flat roof’s albedo. It is challenging to predict the power output of bifacial PV systems over time since it varies as a result of soiling and moss growth. Several previous studies discussed the rooftop installation systems, such as the study by Muehleisen et al. (2021), which rated and evaluated bifacial PV rooftop systems using 20 panels located on a rooftop with white-painted color, power optimizers, and an east-west orientation. It was reported that when compared to panels with 70% bifaciality, which is the ratio of the nominal efficiency at the front side to that at the rear side, the utilization of panels with 92% bifaciality produced a yield that was up to 3% greater. Figure 5A shows an example of rooftop installation (opaque).
FIGURE 5. (A) An example of a bifacial PV rooftop installation (opaque) headquartered in California (Sunpreme’s ‘Maxima’ bifacial modules offer 380W and impedance matching performance – PV Tech, 2022). (B) An example of a transparent bifacial PV installation (Yin et al., 2022). (C) An example of a window with transparent bifacial PV technology used in a hotel in Greece (EU SmartFlex project finishes reference solar façade | glassonweb.com, 2022). (D) An example of a wall opaque facade bifacial PV installation (Electricity from the house wall – the great potential of building facades to capture solar energy – Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, 2023). (E) An example of a flat roof-faced bifacial PV system. (F) An example of skylight sunshade type bifacial PV installation.
The appropriate module area, module efficiency, and area ratio assumptions have a significant impact on the industrial PV possible calculation. Kutlu (2022) proposed an open-source model to estimate the potential energy yield of five different modules of rooftop PVs with different efficiencies, which was verified for all roof types of PVs. According to the findings, the greatest outcome is obtained by thin-film (M5) and mono-Si halfcut (M2) modules in the residential sector and mono-Si and M2 bifacial modules (M3) in commercial and public buildings. One-month simulation and operation studies were presented by Joge (2003) but without quantitative results, while calculations of a rooftop bifacial PV energy potential over 1 month were also considered in Dubai, UAE (Ahmad et al., 2021), to reduce consumption and enhance energy production. Different configurations for the rooftop and façade BIPVs were used for solar PV simulations. Energy production has increased by 9.93% for bifaciality and 19.88% for rooftop tracks. The simulation output of the energy system from a bifacial solar PV system in November was 1965.4 kWh and was 25625.9 kWh annually in Dubai, UAE.
2.2.3 Bifacial flat rooftop
Installing bifacial solar panels on the flat rooftops of commercial buildings is a good approach to increase production. The bifacial gain is largely determined by the flat roof’s albedo. It is challenging to predict the power output of bifacial PV systems over time since it varies as a result of soiling and moss growth (Muehleisen et al., 2021).
Using bifacial solar cells, bifacial PV panels have been created and are now prepared for mass manufacturing (Joge, 2003). On a building rooftop, a fence-integrated system was built as one of the applications to test the bifacial PV panel’s field performance. The following has been confirmed based on the results of the simulation studies and 1-month operation. 1) The system is capable of producing electrical power comparable to that produced by a typical monofacial array set to the south with an ideal tilt. 2) On a good day, output power rises quickly with sunrise and remains practically flatly high until dusk, resulting in perfect daily and yearly power distributions.
2.2.4 Transparent faced
The building envelope, especially the facades, is a crucial component since it affects the internal thermal loads while also providing sizable space for energy generation. However, many design elements affect how well bifacial solar modules work. Therefore, a bifacial PV module performance analysis should be performed to apply bifacial solar modules to buildings. This analysis should take into account different design factors and reflect a variety of installation conditions. A transparent bifacial PV system was addressed by Muehleisen et al. (2021) by comparing it with a corresponding one with a black back sheet, where the results obtained a gain of 17% concerning that of 15%. Song et al. (2022) reviewed transparent bifacial solar modules in design domains, where bifacial advantages and theories are summarized. The study discussed the environmental and economic costs, device durability, and power output. A transparent bifacial glass-to-glass semi-transparent PV device with esthetically pleasing colors and emotionally inoffensive characteristics was developed by Myong and Jeon (2016), combining the color of the back glass by transparent back contact and testing at an ideal tilt angle of 30°. The semi-transparent PV module’s performance ratio was about 124.5% practically, which surpasses its simulated prediction by a drastically high value. Bifacial PV generation can make up for the loss of reduced direct plane-of-array irradiation at a greater tilt angle because the reflected albedo tends to rise toward higher tilt degrees. By harvesting reflected and lit light, the transparent bifacial PV system is appropriate for vertically mounted BIPV modules for usage in traffic noise barriers, roofs, façades, and curtain walls (Myong and Jeon, 2016). The findings of Kang et al. (2016) indicated that the transparent space ratio design aspects and reflectivity have the biggest effects on performance levels. Performance was less affected by the distance between the module and the wall. Depending on the design components, the bifacial BIPV module provided output up to 30% higher than the output of monofacial PV modules. Transparent space ratios of at least 30% should be present in bifacial BIPV modules themselves. Bifacial BIPV modules with transparent space ratios of 40% and higher should be used when a dark color with a reflectivity of 50% or less is used on the exterior wall. An example of a transparent bifacial PV module is shown in Figure 5B.
In order to capture more solar energy and guarantee higher efficiency than traditional PSCs, bifacial transparent perovskite solar modules (BTPSCs) were developed (Gao et al., 2017). A significant factor in attaining photo-to-electricity exchange efficiency was the transmittance and resistance of Au electrodes (PCE). The maximum PCE of 14.74% was achieved by engineering the constructed BTPSCs’ capacity to gather light. Furthermore, it was shown that the main variables impacting PCE were the illumination angle and the intensity of the reflecting light. These BTPSCs could be used for PV building integration, such as Venetian blinds or semi-transparent PV Windows.
2.2.5 Balcony Windows (transparent)
PV modules were formerly solely thought to be installed on building rooftops. However, there are numerous types of PV modules available now that can be mounted on various building surfaces, including balconies, Windows, and curtain walls. Given that the layout design (the orientation of the modules, location, type, and size) has a significant impact on the productivity of the PV system, it is essential to carry out a thorough simulation of radiation potential on various building surfaces to determine the most effective PV layout. A case study for a tall skyscraper in Montreal, Canada, was discussed by Salimzadeh et al. (2020), in which various scenarios were thoroughly compared and designed from a cost and energy standpoint. The study presented a model for the initial investment against the annual average ROI (region of interest) for unlike payback time. This model can help the investor to recognize the correct investment approach according to budgetary restrictions. For example, if the reachable financial plan for PV component setting up at year zero was a 100K, the investor may be expecting payback periods of 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years for an ROI of 18%, 30%, 36%, 37%, 36%, and 34%, respectively. An example of a window with transparent bifacial PVs is shown in Figure 5C.
2.2.6 Wall opaque facade
A partially ventilated and transparent PV facade incorporated into an energy-efficient building’s envelope is continually growing. Such a setup takes advantage of the heat transfer between the building’s main wall, the PV façade, and cavity air for heat recovery in the winter (mechanical ventilation) and PV cooling in the summer (using natural convection). When compared to a normal wall, the opaque ventilated photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) façade can cut the heat flow through the external envelope by 40% (Liang et al., 2020). The particular PV/T facade can be a hybrid module made of a single-sided inflatable plate collector, solar modules, glass lamination, and ethylene–vinyl acetate. According to Liang et al. (2020), the results of the average PV conversion efficiency may reach around 9%, and the developed system’s performance coefficient can reach 3.1%. An example of a wall opaque facade bifacial PV module is shown in Figure 5D.
Saadon et al. (2016) discussed the simulation of a PV facade incorporated into an energy-efficient building envelope that is partially ventilated and transparent. It is reported that the impact of the façade on the heat needs is minimal because these requirements are low for every location analyzed in Toulouse, France. It was discovered that the ventilation requirements are somewhat higher for all of the locations measured.
The case of Universitas Ciputra, which is a building designed with green features, was discussed by Susan and Wardhani (2020). The purpose of this study was to track efforts made to maximize the production of electrical energy from renewable energy sources and the amount of optimal electrical energy produced in comparison to mobile green building requirements. Using the best tilt and orientation angle, the PV panels were integrated into the building façade components (shading device, transparent wall, opaque wall, and roof). The outcome demonstrated that 6%–22% of the required maximum power demand might be replaced by the use of the BIPV concept. The predicted BIPV efficiency of electricity production was found between 8% and 9.5%, with no effect of outdoor air temperature and ventilation airflow rate on PV module cooling. A total of 7.5%–4.5% of daily solar radiation can be used as heat gains through opaque envelope walls, and between 75% and 35% of daily solar radiation can be used to pre-heat the air for space ventilation (Domjan et al., 2020).
2.2.7 Flat roof-faced
Sustainable buildings with bifacial PV modules installed on flat rooftops are an effective method to enhance the bifacial gain, and consequently, the energy yields determined by the albedo of the flat roof. It is challenging to predict the power output of bifacial PV systems over time since it varies as a result of moss and soiling growth. An example of a flat roof-faced bifacial PV module is shown in Figure 5E.
A fence-integrated building was installed on a rooftop as one of the applications (Joge, 2003), and a small plant with 20 panels, including dummies, was set up to study the impact of bifacial PV rooftop systems. A commercial bifacial PV module supporting construction was installed on a white-painted flat roof to ensure an ideal output (Muehleisen et al., 2021). It is reported that initially, the east- and west-oriented panels of the bifacial module with a transparent back sheet outperformed those of the module with a black back sheet by 17% and 15%, respectively. Due to albedo loss from moss growth and pollution, after 1 year of operation, the east- and west-oriented panels still provided a measured benefit of 7% and 5%, respectively. When compared to panels with 70% bifaciality, the utilization of panels with 92% bifaciality produced a yield that was up to 3% greater.
2.2.8 Skylight sunshade type
PV panels can be connected with structures in a variety of ways, including skylights and sunshades, which not only aids in the production of energy but also creates thermal heat and daylight. It also improves the building’s esthetic appeal. The building industry consumes more than one-third of the world’s energy. One study investigated skylights and sunshade installation types in Varanasi, India (Gupta and Tiwari, 2017). It is reported that the life-cycle conversion efficiency, energy production factor, and energy payback time for average daily solar radiation = 450 W/m 2 and ΔT = 8°C was obtained as 0.47 years (for 300 years), 19.58 years (for 300 years), and 15.32 years, respectively. An example of a skylight sunshade bifacial PV module is shown in Figure 5F.
2.3.1 Simulation software
Simulation and optimization techniques are of great significance for the BIPV system analysis. In academic studies, simulation work has increased due to recent technological advancements. These advancements make the analysis and design of BIPV systems simpler and more affordable. Table 3 lists the software programs that are used for design and analysis.
TABLE 3. Software and simulation programs that are used for optimization, design, and analysis of BIPV systems.
Generally speaking, modeling was performed to assess BIPV performance through thorough fluid and temperature analysis. Software that resolves difficult mathematical equations was also used to conduct theoretical calculations. Saretta et al. (2020) proposed a computational technique to match the architectural characteristics of façades with the current PV radiation analysis using building typological indicators. In the same context, Tablada et al. (2018) presented a concept of a productive façade method to integrate PV modules as shading elements and for farming planters. The maximum façade systems were set based on the conditions, the availability of resources, and the context of the Singapore Tropical Technologies Laboratory, where they were installed. Salimzadeh and Hammad (2017) discussed PV panels’ location optimization on balcony Windows by optimizing the layout, number, and size of PV modules to achieve maximum energy generation and maximize the panel capacity.
2.3.2 Future trends
The existing studies demonstrated that BIPV systems are a promising field to sustain energy generation toward nearly net-zero-energy building, especially when the BIPV system is a bifacial PV type. However, gathering non-uniformly dispersed back incident illumination is a very challenging issue in BIPV systems, and the majority of studies are unable to handle huge sets of plan variables and automatically provide a collection of different best designs. On the cellular, modular, and systems levels, there are still a lot of bifacial PV-related development and optimization opportunities. A document released by NREL (Sahu et al., 2021) provides a summary of the technical themes from the virtual Bifacial PV Workshop 2020. Bifacial PV with power optimization could be one of the solutions for improving the robustness of BIPV systems. Therefore, this work compares the optimization-based normal PV and bifacial PV optimization strategies.
Survey on related reviews
According to the collected publications in the field of BIPVs, several review studies discussed such systems in terms of design topologies, applications, installation types, energy yields, optimization techniques, luxury, and thermal comfort. Table 4 lists several valuable literature studies classified according to the area of electrical energy yield and thermal performance with their associated applications.
TABLE 4. Literature studies classified according to the region of interest with their FOCUS and significant findings.
The table demonstrates a number of points that can be highlighted. For electrical energy yield and thermal performance areas, the studies by Biyik et al. (2017), Pandey (2016), and Yu et al. (2021) benefit researchers and practitioners working on or interested in BIPV system design, analysis, modeling, performance evaluation, financial development and incentives, and new techniques and trends. Electrical energy yield has interesting areas, such as the papers by Zahedi (2006), Martín-Chivelet et al. (2018), Akbari et al. (2019), Irshad et al. (2019), Idzkowski et al. (2020), Dai and Bai (2021), Singh et al. (2021), Uzum (2021), and Lamnatou et al. (2022), which addressed the function of energy storage for PV in the situation of prospect energy storage progresses, provided an assessment between the advantages and disadvantages of the key methods, and examined the resolution techniques which used machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence-based optimization. According to these studies, an increase of 22% in potential energy saving and a reduction of 5°C–10°C interior temperature from the ambient surroundings can be achieved. A categorization of façade building-integrated photovoltaic thermal systems is shown in Figure 6.
FIGURE 6. Categorization of façade building-integrated photovoltaic thermal systems.
Due to environmental concerns, the need for energy independence, and the high cost of fossil fuels, renewable and sustainable energy-producing technologies have taken the lead. Researchers and practitioners working in or interested in financial development, performance evaluation, modeling, analysis, design, incentives, innovative approaches, and trends of BIPV systems are anticipated to benefit from such thorough review studies. Intelligent demand-side management must be used in conjunction with effective and affordable energy storage solutions for photovoltaic systems to be completely integrated into networks. Increasing onsite use of power generated by PV technology will become crucial to maintaining the integrity of the energy grid as the worldwide market for solar photovoltaics expands beyond 76 GW. The analysis of all the different electrical and thermal energy storage systems that can be coupled with PV was discussed by Akbari et al. (2019). Along with the function of energy storage for PV in the context of upcoming improvements in energy storage, the integration of PV energy storage in Smart buildings was considered (Pandey, 2016). BIPVs has excellent integration possibilities for supplying electrical and thermal loads in buildings. Biyik et al. (2017) thoroughly examined the performance, efficiency, nominal power, energy generation amount, and type of assessment methods of BIPV and thermal BIPV applications. The two primary research areas in BIPVs are found to be 1) system efficiency improvements through ventilation, resulting in a better yield with a lower panel temperature, and 2) cutting-edge thin-film technologies that are excellent for integration into buildings.
Solar collectors and solar PVs are combined for combination with building façades to produce electricity and create heat power. As a result, the cooling/heating load on buildings can be decreased, while solar energy efficiency can be greatly boosted. Thus, such an application offers a viable way to create low- or even zero-energy buildings by drastically reducing building energy consumption (Yu et al., 2021). Chan (2019) presented a survey to select and identify 25 accessible commercial constructions with various degrees of adjacent shading [in terms of orientations and ranging (0.16–0.95) sky view factors]. The total installed PV capacity in some countries like India reached 33.7 GW by the end of December 2020, as reported by Reddy (2020), who stated that in terms of reducing the HVAC load on the building, BIPV systems are the greatest option for the Indian context. A framework overview of the BIPV system, including models used, outputs, and data inputs, is shown in Figure 7.
FIGURE 7. Framework overview of the BIPV system, including models used (in blue), modeling outputs (in white), and data inputs (in red) (Cavadini and Cook, 2021).
In the energy optimization area, the studies by Mellit (2020), Hashempour et al. (2020), and Ramos et al. (2021) present concepts sustained by formulation for the optimization difficulty to be explained by the society administrator, features of comfort environment, and some types of weather conditions, except thermal comfort. Liu et al. (2021) reviewed the field of electrical energy and solar irradiance to present precious information for the expansion of BIPV schemes in sections with high solar irradiance. In another context, Zhou (2021) addressed only the thermal energy issues. It is reported that BIPV can improve solar comprehensive utilization efficiency and present original ideas for potential studies on energy harvest payment. Finally, the study by Barzegkar-Ntovom et al. (2020) evaluates the economic viability of hybrid PV-and-storage systems for BIPV systems.
These studies discussed BIPV systems thoroughly in terms of design topologies, applications, installation types, energy yields, optimization techniques, luxury, and thermal comfort. However, all the studies review the integration of PVs with low- and large-scale buildings but not bifacial PVs.
Bifacial PV-based integrated buildings
If the electricity generated by the bifaciality is captured, bifacial PV modules could be a compelling substitute for monofacial PV modules even in the context of building combinations. Bifacial PV modules are able to produce more energy than conventional PV modules (Appelbaum, 2019). The influence of a bifacial PV module on the indoor environment is more complicated as a result of the thermoelectric effect, which is produced due to the module’s losses at the back. Through experiments and simulations of the PV building (Zhao et al., 2022), investigated in the internal environment of bifacial PV modules as the building envelope, it was discovered that the optimization design greatly improved the indoor environment and extended the annual thermal comfort by about 8%.
In simulations of buildings with integrated active facades, a numerical model that permits assessing the thermal and electrical energy equilibrium of BIPV façades was presented by Tina et al. (2021). The glass–glass bifacial photovoltaic façade generates an energy yield of roughly 5% greater than the monofacial BIPV façade, according to the calculations made using the meteorological data from Catania, Italy. Kim et al. (2021) discussed bifacial BIPVs for zero-energy buildings for achieving high power output through gathering light from both sides, but harvesting non-uniformly distributed back incident light is a very challenging issue in bifacial BIPVs.
For BIPV window applications, passive solar concentrators made of the film were used (Cook and Al-Hallaj, 2019). In order to make window glass act as a waveguide and direct light onto the back of bifacial BIPV modules, micro-facets were used to generate complete internal reflection. Two readily available films were used in experimental validation. Both films made the module used as a passive solar concentrator by allowing solar energy to reach the rear side of the module over the range of incident angles that were considered. There was a maximum of 35.1% increase in power. The findings show that film-based optical components could be used in BIPV applications as passive solar concentrators. According to Appelbaum (2019), the vertical mounting’s performance for the equatorial regions of the bifacial PV panel is marginally inferior to that of the latitude-mounted mounting. One model for bifacial BIPV application that achieved an accuracy of 99% is described by Alam et al. (2021) using the finite element mesh generation method to form quasi-uniform grids.
The annual incident energy (global energy, diffuse, and beam) on overhangs made up of conventional and bifacial PV modules is computed by Appelbaum et al. (2019) together with the fluctuation in shadows produced by overhangs on doors, Windows, and carports. The portion of the bifacial PV module’s backside receives reflected energy (5% or more) from the ground and walls. With mean photovoltaic module temperatures reaching 68.3°C in the warm season, a considerable thermal gradient is seen throughout the façade, as expected, and is mostly caused by site albedo. The creative facade generated 63.8 kWh/m 2 of cumulative electrical energy annually, with a performance ratio of 0.7 and an annualized average efficiency of 6.28%. In comparison to the benchmark, a significant decrease in the building’s overall energy use of up to 92% is seen throughout the winter (Assoa et al., 2021). The tilt angle induces variations in the power equilibrium of two unlike types of PV modules, bifacial and monofacial, which were discussed by Bilčík et al. (2020). To test the effectiveness of an integrated bifacial solar PV system and cool roof technology to enhance solar energy production and decrease building energy consumption, Ahmad et al. (2021) presented the design and performance analysis of a bifacial solar PV system for an energy-efficient home with and without a tracking system. By combining several technologies, energy production increased by 19.88% for rooftop tracking, 9.93% for bifaciality, and 10.14% for façade monitoring. The tracking system self-consumes at a rate of 4.66%. Comparing the results to those of a traditional monofacial fixed installation, a total improvement of 35.29% was noted. The output of the energy system from the simulation was 25,625.9 kWh annually. The output of a bifacial solar PV system in November was 1,965.4 kWh. Table 5 presents a brief comparison of the previously conducted studies for bifacial PV-integrated buildings.
TABLE 5. Comparison table of the previously conducted studies for bifacial PV-integrated buildings.
Monofacial solar PV-integrated buildings
In order to capture solar power through PVs and heat consumption, a building-integrated multifunctional roofing system has been expanded. This system minimizes PV efficiency and eliminates the labor and material redundancy of a standard PV system. Elnosh et al. (2018) examined PV modules that faced south over 2 years in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, at three different tilt degrees (5, 25, and 90). It has been discovered that while the tilt angle has no bearing on temperature loss, it has a considerable impact on soiling losses, with lesser tilt angles leading to more soiling losses. The research findings can be used to choose the best PV module technology, type, and tilt angle for installations of building-applied photovoltaic (BAPV), which is powered partly or totally by solar PVs, and building-integrated photovoltaic systems in various geographical locations. A modified building system in which normal PV modules are incorporated with a ventilated façade was also discussed by Martín-Chivelet et al. (2018). The study reported that for a typical meteorological year, the grid-connected PV system is predicted to produce 20 MWh of electricity annually. This amount equaled 4.6% of the building’s 432 MWh/year total annual electric power consumption before the rehabilitation project. There was a 19-MWh/year production monitored over a full year, from October 2016 to September 2017. When the energy retrofit is finished, including the replacement of the Windows and lighting, a 30% reduction in energy usage is anticipated. PV energy will then account for 6.6% of the total consumption.
The two primary techniques for increasing the energy sustainability of buildings at a neighborhood size are the incorporation of renewable energy sources and architectural rehabilitation, although optimizing these processes concurrently is challenging. The findings of Guen (2018) demonstrate that upgrading all buildings decreases the need for space heating by 70%–85% and lessens energy demand swings, enabling the integration of additional renewable energy. According to the calculations, BIPVs can meet the village’s whole yearly energy consumption. The energy system assessment reveals that, even with the integration of non-dispatchable renewable energy technologies, it is challenging to go beyond the 60% mark. As a result, there are now opportunities for the installation of PV modules in double façades. It is preferable to space PV modules away from south-facing building walls to allow heat rejection, prevent overheating, and maintain efficiency (Zogou and Stapountzis, 2011). In the same context, according to a study on Australia’s city of Melbourne, the majority of the city’s solar energy potential is provided by PV rooftops. It is demonstrated, however, that the PV prospective of Windows becomes more pronounced for specific buildings with high compactness of glazed and high-rise buildings (Panagiotidou et al., 2021). The technological workflow described here allows various cities to simplify decision-making regarding the achievement of PV in urban settings (Panagiotidou et al., 2021).
The performance ratio (PR), which is the ratio of measured output to expected output for a specific reporting period, of a BIPV grid-connected system at the research site was found to be 71.21%, whereas the PR for standing PV systems was determined to be 75.1%. This is true for the grid-connected PV system (Makinde et al., 2021). The study estimates that the roofs and facades of campus buildings can generate 8.1 GWh of PV energy per year, which can gather 10% of the current energy demand, with the campus as a whole requiring 82.6 GWh of electricity annually (Zhou, 2022). Table 6 presents a brief comparison of the previously conducted studies for monofacial PV-integrated buildings.
TABLE 6. Comparison table of the previously conducted studies for monofacial PV-integrated buildings.
As epitomized in Table 6, the mismatching sags of the DC grid voltage and the control issues with energy transfer for the PV microgrid are rarely recognized. Instead of rating systems based on how efficiently they convert or transport energy over the course of a day, all published research competes on the fast-tracking of MPPs. The challenge is in getting the MPP values while using a high sample frequency. This problem is critical for MPPT in grid-connected PV systems without batteries, which, in turn, calls for a fast processor and memory. Power modules may be put under more stress and have a shorter operating lifespan due to these high switching frequencies (Jia et al., 2018). Thus, switching at a somewhat lower frequency and maintaining a stable DC voltage are essential for a microgrid system to produce quality power and function reliably.
Zero-energy buildings integrated with PVs
The idea of “zero-energy buildings” focuses on first enhancing the building envelope’s energy efficiency and then incorporating renewable energy sources to meet the balance of the energy demand. In this situation, PV systems offer a dependable option for electricity delivery in both new and existing structures. The nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) concept, proposed by Tina (2020), emphasizes improving the energy performance of the building envelope and integrating RESs to satisfy the energy demand. When bifacial PV modules are included in a building’s façade, they work as both an active system that produces green energy and a passive system that lessens the need for cooling the building. It has been shown that bifacial glass–glass PV modules can produce an energy yield that is approximately 5% higher than that of monofacial PV modules (Tina, 2020). Semi-transparent photovoltaics (STPVs) or PV shading devices (PVSDs) are two examples of BIPVs that concentrate on Windows and are suggested as effective methods for generating electricity and enhancing building energy performance (Skandalos and Karamanis, 2021). However, because it takes more than a thousand years to develop transparent window glass with good visibility, the replacement of the glass with modern PV concepts requires careful consideration of energy and environmental impacts. There are few comparative studies of the suggested PV integration options and the best integration solutions for various climatic regions despite the abundance of published studies about the performance of each technology.
BIPVs represent an effective technology to reach zero-energy buildings (ZEBs) by means of solar power utilization. A BIPV system can seamlessly integrate PV modules into external building surfaces, such as walls, roofs, shading devices, and decorative components. BIPV surfaces can be used on roofs and façades, and their effectiveness and productivity are influenced by factors such as direction, shade, and surface reflections (Boccalatte et al., 2020). It is found that the annual NZED criteria are met in this instance by collecting solar energy on 60% of rooftops and 60% of the total area of façades, with an 11% loss in energy production per PV unit area due to “darkening” effects caused by PV surrounding buildings.
To achieve the maximum potential financial results for the electricity operating cost for the castle when weighed with the rate to feed power to the utility (Gremmelspacher et al., 2021), a second PV system’s azimuth and tilt were optimized for maximum electricity production. Nine financial scenarios were used in this study to examine the viability of both PV systems using life-cycle cost calculations, using the net present value technique. A comparison of the primary energy generated and used by the historic structure was provided for two scenarios, and it demonstrated that the case study object might reach net-ZEB.
For an office building, a Smart lighting system incorporating daylight harvesting by BIPVs was suggested by Shankar et al. (2021) to reduce energy use and improve tenants’ visual preferences. For the proposed system at ZEB, the benefits of a low-voltage DC supply system were emphasized. Additionally, the potential for energy savings across the proposed artificial lighting system with BIPVs as the building’s envelope was explored for occupants’ visual preferences under various sky conditions. The paper’s results indicated that the energy produced by the BIPV module can fully power the suggested lighting system. Additionally, a considerable amount of extra energy was noticed. Comparing the outcome to the utility grid that is now in place, the levelized cost of electrical energy (LCOE), which is a determination of the average net current price of electricity production of a generator concerning its lifespan, is found to be competent.
Optimization of BIPV systems
Building-integrated photovoltaic envelope design calls for the consideration of a sizable number of PV- and envelope-related characteristics and competing performance standards. As a result, BIPV design optimization is essential and is now a challenging task discussed by a few studies. Russo (2012) stated that with improved prediction skills, it will be possible to design more efficient building-integrated PV applications and maximize energy harvesting from systems with unusual mounting situations (Susan, 2021).
Samarasinghalage et al. (2022) introduced a framework that includes several envelope design parameters in addition to PV-related features, such as PV product type, PV positioning, window-to-wall ratio (WWR), and tilt angle. The study produced a list of the top BIPV design possibilities based on a variety of goals, structural characteristics, and PV products. The best BIPV product and building surface attributes for a certain performance criterion are examples of alternative designs. The findings of Samarasinghalage et al. (2022) demonstrated that MOO is functional for early BIPV design choices based on technical energy and cost factors. Jung et al. (2021) assessed the PV power generation and reduced the heat effects of Windows using a mobile shade device and using artificial intelligence approaches to analyze the effects on window heat transfer. The paper found that the window heat transfer in ANN control was 86.3% lower during a cooling period and 9.7% lower during a heating period. Furthermore, during the cooling period, the PV system generated 3.0%–3.1% more electric power when it was controlled properly. A compassion diagram showing the methodology for stand-alone and grid-connected BIPV modules is shown in Figure 8.
FIGURE 8. Compassion diagram showing the methodology for stand-alone and grid-connected BIPV modules: (A) Stand-alone BIPV, (B) Grid-connected BIPV.
Fathabadi (2015) suggested a plan using a PV converter battery to improve BIPV energy effectiveness. Results from both simulated and actual experiments showed an increase of roughly 10% and 9.3% in energy efficiency, respectively, while the study by Chen et al. (2019) presented a comparative analysis with the holistic design optimization method. The variance-based and screening-based sensitivity analyses are combined with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) and hybrid generalized pattern search particle swarm optimization in the holistic design optimization technique (HGPSPSO). This study conducted the experiments under Hong Kong’s hot summer and warm winter conditions and reported that the net construction demand can be decreased by up to 71.36% with the ideal design configuration. Omar et al. (2022) proposed a conversion approach from a traditional educational facility to a net-zero-energy building (NZEB). In order to put such a system of retrofitting strategies into practice, a school building in Egypt is chosen as a case study. It is found that optimized sizes are 140 kW and 120 kW, with capital costs of 30,399 and 98,000 for the inverter and PV kit, respectively. These components are integrated into the building after increasing its energy efficiency. Additionally, it will take 24 years for the PV/grid system for the new load to make back all of its expenses (after using the retrofitting technique).
The findings of these studies can be used in the early planning stages of low-energy building guidelines and integrated PV applications. However, the majority of studies are unable to handle huge sets of design variables and to automatically provide a collection of alternative optimal designs. The design of a BIPV envelope now heavily relies on an optimization methodology. A graphical representation of the number of publications on the main investigated area of the energy optimization techniques for BIPV systems is shown in Figure 9.
FIGURE 9. Graphical representation of the number of publications on the main investigated area of the energy optimization techniques for BIPV systems.
This figure shows that the largest interest was in computing the electrical energy yield of BIPV systems and that the annual energy yield is the key factor to evaluate the system performance. The survey results are expected as high energy demand has been seen in most cities in recent years as a result of industrialization and Rapid population increase. One of the top concerns of scientists and policymakers around the world is providing enough electrical energy while lowering greenhouse gas emissions. The energy authorities in most countries are becoming more conscious of the need to reduce the negative environmental effects of non-renewable energy by investigating alternative sustainable energy sources and enhancing the energy efficiency of buildings. BIPV technology has gained recent attention as a possible method for providing buildings with instantaneous sustainable energy. Solar energy should be widely used in residential structures within the urban context to make a significant contribution to zero-energy buildings.
The presented paper thoroughly discussed and evaluated the integration viability of solar PVs with the building envelope, the annual energy yield, and the electrical energy optimization techniques at the residential building level. A general overview of the principles for BIPV and bifacial PV systems and their characteristics have been provided, and knowledge of some weather parameters and their devastating consequences. A discussion about the differences in the calculation of the efficiency of BIPV and bifacial BIPV systems has also been addressed. Providing a clear understanding for the examination of such systems and presenting a comprehensive assessment of current research on proactive BIPV and bifacial PV enhancement measures. The use of bifacial PV-integrated systems and installation types for strengthening BIPV systems is one of these solutions, which has been fully discussed in this study.
The use of BIPVs, especially with bifacial PV modules, is currently still limited in real conditions despite the recent increase in attention given to BIPV systems. Sustainable buildings with bifacial PV modules installed on building envelop spaces are an effective way to enhance the bifacial gain and, consequently, the energy yields determined by the albedo of these building spaces. Given that the layout design (the orientation of the modules, location, type, and size) has a significant impact on the productivity of the PV system, this study found that it is essential to carry out thorough research on radiation potential on various building surfaces to determine the most effective PV layout. The existing studies demonstrated that the BIPV systems are a promising field to sustain energy generation toward nearly net-zero-energy buildings, especially when the BIPV module is a bifacial PV type. However, cropping non-uniformly spread back incident daylight is an extremely challenging problem in BIPV systems, and the majority of studies are unable to handle huge datasets of plan variables and automatically provide a collection of substitute best possible configurations.
It is preferable to space PV modules away from south-facing building walls to allow heat rejection, prevent overheating, and maintain efficiency in all locations that have been covered in this paper. Another difficulty is making use of the heat that the PV modules reject, especially in countries with hot climates. The graphical representation for the number of publications on the main investigated area of the energy optimization techniques showed that the largest interest was in computing the electrical energy yield for BIPV systems. The design of a BIPV envelope now heavily relies on an optimization methodology. The existing publications discussed the optimization issue only in terms of software retrofitting. Therefore, future directions need to FOCUS on developing new hardware configurations to optimize the PV power generation for each installation type individually since every installation type has its weather environment.
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by ZA, MD, and AS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ZA, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to the School of Electrical and Electronics, USM Engineering Campus, Malaysia, for their support in completing this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abdallah, T., Diabat, A., and Rigter, J. (2013). Investigating the option of installing small scale PVs on facility rooftops in a green supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 146, 465–477. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.03.016
Abdelhafez, M. H. H. (2021). Integrating solar photovoltaics in residential buildings: Towards zero energy buildings in hail city, ksa. Switzerland: Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su13041845
Adamovic, N., Zimmermann, A., Caviasca, A., Harboe, R., and Ibanez, F. (2017). Custom designed photovoltaic modules for PIPV and BIPV applications. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 9, 021202. doi:10.1063/1.4979820
Agrawal, B., and Tiwari, G. N. (2011). An energy and exergy analysis of building integrated photovoltaic thermal systems. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects. doi:10.1080/15567030903226280
Ahmad, F. F., Ghenai, C., and Belpoliti, V. (2021). “Performance analysis of combined bifacial solar PV, building integrated photovoltaics, and solar tracking system for energy efficient house,” in ZEMCH International Conference.
AjithgopiSudhakar, K., and Wai Keng, N. (2021). Design and simulation of solar roof-top projects for an energy self-reliant University campus. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1078, 012013. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1078/1/012013
Akbari, H., Browne, M. C., Ortega, A., Huang, M. J., Hewitt, N. J., Norton, B., et al. (2019). Efficient energy storage technologies for photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 192, 144–168. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.052
Akbari Paydar, M. (2020). Optimum design of building integrated PV module as a movable shading device. Sustainable Cities and Society. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102368
Alam, M., Gul, M. S., and Muneer, T. (2021). Ground view factor computation model for bifacial photovoltaic collector field: Uniform and non-uniform surfaces. Energy Rep. 7, 9133–9149. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.206
Alkhateeb, E., and Abu-Hijleh, B. (2019). Potential for retrofitting a federal building in the UAE to net zero electricity building (nZEB). Heliyon 5, e01971. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01971
Appelbaum, J., Aronescu, A., and Maor, T. (2019). Shading by overhang PV collectors. Switzerland: Applied Sciences. doi:10.3390/app9204280
Appelbaum, J. (2019). Bifacial MODULES: There ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY SOLAR PANEL. Energies.
Arnaout, M. A., Go, Y. I., and Saqaff, A. (2020). Pilot study on building-integrated PV: Technical assessment and economic analysis. Int. J. Energy Res. 44, 9538–9559. doi:10.1002/er.5204
Assoa, Y. B., Thony, P., Messaoudi, P., Schmitt, E., Bizzini, O., Gelibert, S., et al. (2021). Study of a building integrated bifacial photovoltaic facade. Sol. Energy 227, 497–515. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.004
Ayala, P., Muñoz, C., Osorio, N., Hernández, P., Zurita, F., Gutierrez, V., et al. (2018). Bifacial technology performance compared with three commercial monofacial PV technologies under outdoor high irradiance conditions at the Atacama Desert. in 2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC)(A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC 34th EU PVSEC) ( IEEE ), 0672–0675. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547345
Bakos, G. C., Soursos, M., and Tsagas, N. F. (2003). Technoeconomic assessment of a building-integrated PV system for electrical energy saving in residential sector. Energy Build. 35, 757–762. doi:10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00229-3
Bambrook, S. M., and Sproul, A. B. (2012). Maximising the energy output of a PVT air system. Sol. Energy 86, 1857–1871. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.038
Barzegkar-Ntovom, G. A., Chatzigeorgiou, N. G., Nousdilis, A. I., Vomva, S. A., Kryonidis, G. C., Kontis, E. O., et al. (2020). Assessing the viability of battery energy storage systems coupled with photovoltaics under a pure self-consumption scheme. Renew. Energy 152, 1302–1309. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.061
Bilčík, M., Božiková, M., Kotoulek, P., Kišev, M., Csillag, J., and Petrović, A. (2020). Comparison of the annual power balance of photovoltaic modules. J. Process. Energy Agric. 24, 18–21. doi:10.5937/jpea24-25659
Biyik, E., Araz, M., Hepbasli, A., Shahrestani, M., Yao, R., Shao, L., et al. (2017). A key review of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20, 833–858. doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.009
Boccalatte, A., Fossa, M., and Ménézo, C. (2020). Best arrangement of BIPV surfaces for future NZEB districts while considering urban heat island effects and the reduction of reflected radiation from solar façades. Renew. Energy 160, 686–697. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.057
Cavadini, G. B., and Cook, L. M. (2021). Green and cool roof choices integrated into rooftop solar energy modelling. Appl. Energy 296, 117082. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117082
Champion Photovoltaic Module Efficiency Chart | Photovoltaic research | NREL (2022). Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/module-efficiency.html (Accessed: 30 December 2022).
Chan, A. L. S. (2019). Effect of adjacent shading on the energy and environmental performance of photovoltaic glazing system in building application. Energy 187, 115939. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.115939
Chandrika, V. S. (2021). Performance assessment of free standing and building integrated grid connected photovoltaic system for southern part of India. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology. doi:10.1177/0143624420977749
Chen, F., and Yin, H. (2016). Fabrication and laboratory-based performance testing of a building-integrated photovoltaic-thermal roofing panel. Appl. Energy 177, 271–284. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.112
Chen, X., Huang, J., Yang, H., and Peng, J. (2019). Approaching low-energy high-rise building by integrating passive architectural design with photovoltaic application. J. Clean. Prod. 220, 313–330. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.137
China P-type Monocrystalline Bifacial Solar Module LYGF-BP72P factory and suppliers (2023). Linyang. Available at: https://global.linyang.com/p-type-monocrystalline-bifacial-solar-module-lygf-bp72p-product/ (Accessed: 16 January 2023).
Cook, M. J., and Al-Hallaj, S. (2019). Film-based optical elements for passive solar concentration in a BIPV window application. Sol. Energy 180, 226–242. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.078
Dai, Y., Bai, Y., and Cai, Z. (2021). Thermal and mechanical evaluation on integration of GFRP and thin-film flexible PV cells for building applications. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125809. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125809
Dai, Y., and Bai, Y. (2021). Performance improvement for building integrated photovoltaics in practice: A review. Energies 14, 178. doi:10.3390/en14010178
Dalal, R., Bansal, K., and Thapar, S. (2021). Bridging the energy gap of India’s residential buildings by using rooftop solar PV systems for higher energy stars. Clean. Energy 5, 423–432. doi:10.1093/ce/zkab017
Defaix, P. R. (2012). Technical potential for photovoltaics on buildings in the EU-27. Solar Energy. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.007
Dobrzycki, A., Kurz, D., Mikulski, S., and Wodnicki, G. (2020). Analysis of the impact of building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) on reducing the demand for electricity and heat in buildings located in Poland. Energies 13, 2549. doi:10.3390/en13102549
Domjan, S., Petek, L., Arkar, C., and Medved, S. (2020). Experimental study on energy efficiency of multi-functional BIPV glazed façade structure during heating season. Energies 13, 2772. doi:10.3390/en13112772
D’Orazio, M., Di Perna, C., and Di Giuseppe, E. (2013). Performance assessment of different roof integrated photovoltaic modules under Mediterranean Climate. Energy Procedia 42, 183–192. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.018
Electricity from the house wall – the great potential of building facades to capture solar energy. Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (2023). Electricity from the house wall – the great potential of building facades to capture solar energy. Available at: https://www.ioer.de/en/press/news/electricity-from-the-house-wall-the-great-potential-of-building-facades-to-capture-solar-energy (Accessed January 7, 2023).
Elnosh, A., Al-Ali, H. O., John, J. J., Alnuaimi, A., Ubinas, E. R., Stefancich, M., et al. (2018). Field study of factors influencing performance of PV modules in buildings (BIPV/BAPV) installed in UAE. 2018 IEEE 7th World Conf. Photovolt. Energy Convers. WCPEC 2018. A Jt. Conf. 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC 34th E. U. PVSEC. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547298
Enaganti, P. K., Dwivedi, P. K., Srivastava, A. K., and Goel, S. (2020). Study of solar irradiance and performance analysis of submerged monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 28, 725–735. doi:10.1002/pip.3264
EU SmartFlex project finishes reference solar façade | glassonweb.com (2022). Available at: https://www.glassonweb.com/news/eu-smartflex-project-finishes-reference-solar-facade (Accessed: 15 December 2022).
Fang, Z., Xu, Z., Jang, T., Zhou, F., and Huang, S. (2020). Standard deviation quantitative characterization and process optimization of the pyramidal texture of monocrystalline silicon cells. Materials 13, 564. doi:10.3390/ma13030564
Fathabadi, H. (2015). Increasing energy efficiency of PV-converter-battery section of standalone building integrated photovoltaic systems. Energy Build. 101, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.024
Gao, L., Zhao, E., Yang, S., Wang, L., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2017). Light engineering for bifacial transparent perovskite solar cells with high performance. Opt. Eng. 56, 1. doi:10.1117/1.oe.56.11.117107
Giouri, E. D., Tenpierik, M., and Turrin, M. (2020). Zero energy potential of a high-rise office building in a Mediterranean climate: Using multi-objective optimization to understand the impact of design decisions towards zero-energy high-rise buildings. Energy and Buildings. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109666
Gostein, M., Marion, B., and Stueve, B. (2020). “Spectral effects in albedo and Rearside irradiance measurement for bifacial performance estimation,” in Conference record of the IEEE photovoltaic Specialists Conference. doi:10.1109/PVSC45281.2020.9300518
Gremmelspacher, J. M., Campamà Pizarro, R., van Jaarsveld, M., Davidsson, H., and Johansson, D. (2021). Historical building renovation and PV optimisation towards NetZEB in Sweden. Sol. Energy 223, 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.02.067
Guen, M. Le (2018). Improving the energy sustainability of a Swiss village through building renovation and renewable energy integration. Energy and Buildings. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.057
Gupta, N., and Tiwari, G. N. (2017). Energy Matrices of building integrated photovoltaic thermal systems: Case study. J. Archit. Eng. 23. doi:10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000270
Guzman, C. P., Arias, N. B., Franco, J. F., Soares, J., Vale, Z., and Romero, R. (2021). Boosting the usage of green energy for EV Charging in Smart buildings managed by an Aggregator through a novel renewable usage Index. IEEE Access 9, 105357–105368. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3099426
Hashempour, N., Taherkhani, R., and Mahdikhani, M. (2020). Energy performance optimization of existing buildings: A literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101967
Hemmerle, C. (2017). Solar PV building skins. structural requirements and environmental benefits. J. Facade Des. Eng. doi:10.7480/jfde.2017.1.1528
Huang, J., Chen, X., Yang, H., and Zhang, W. (2018). Numerical investigation of a novel vacuum photovoltaic curtain wall and integrated optimization of photovoltaic envelope systems. Appl. Energy 229, 1048–1060. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.095
Huang, M. J., Eames, P. C., and Norton, B. (2004). Thermal regulation of building-integrated photovoltaics using phase change materials. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 47, 2715–2733. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.11.015
Huang, M. J., and Hewitt, N. J. (2020), Enhancing energy Utilisation in building with combining building integrated PV and air source heat Pump for Underfloor heating using phase change materials. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18488-9_67
Hwang, T., Kang, S., and Kim, J. T. (2012). Optimization of the building integrated photovoltaic system in office buildings. FOCUS on the orientation, inclined angle and installed area. Energy Build. 46, 92–104. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.041
Idzkowski, A., Karasowska, K., and Walendziuk, W. (2020). Temperature analysis of the stand-alone and building integrated photovoltaic systems based on simulation and measurement data. Energies 13, 4274. doi:10.3390/en13164274
Irshad, K., Habib, K., Saidur, R., Kareem, M., and Saha, B. B. (2019). Study of thermoelectric and photovoltaic facade system for energy efficient building development: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 1376–1395. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.245
Janßen, L. (2009). Silicon nitride passivated bifacial Cz-silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.015
Jayathissa, P. (2016). Life cycle assessment of dynamic building integrated photovoltaics. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.017
Jia, H., Xiao, Q., and He, J. (2018). An improved grid current and DC capacitor voltage balancing method for three-Terminal hybrid AC/DC microgrid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 3053 (1), 5876–5888. doi:10.1109/TSG.2018.2834340
Joge, T. (2003). “Advanced applications of bifacial solar modelus,” in Proceedings of the 3rd world Conference on photovoltaic energy conversion.
Jung, D. E., Lee, C., Lee, K. H., Shin, M., and Do, S. L. (2021). Evaluation of building energy performance with optimal control of movable shading device integrated with pv system. Energies 14, 1799. doi:10.3390/en14071799
Kamel, R. S., and Fung, A. S. (2014). Modeling, simulation and feasibility analysis of residential BIPV/TASHP system in cold climate. Canada. Energy Build. 82, 758–770. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.081
Kang, J. G., Kim, J. H., and Kim, J. T. (2016). Design elements and electrical performance of a bifacial BIPV module. Int. J. Photoenergy 2016, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2016/6943936
Khan, M. A. (2018). Design of a building-integrated photovoltaic system with a novel Bi-reflector PV system (BRPVs) and optimal control mechanism. Switzerland: An experimental study. doi:10.3390/electronics7070119
Kim, C., Jeong, M. S., Ko, J., Ko, M., Kang, M. G., and Song, H. J. (2021). Inhomogeneous rear reflector induced hot-spot risk and power loss in building-integrated bifacial c-Si photovoltaic modules. Renew. Energy 163, 825–835. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.020
Kirimtat, A. (2022). Control of PV integrated shading devices in buildings: A review. Building and Environment. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108961
Klenk, M. (2018). “Bifacial PV systems and yield data (bifacial gain),” in Bifacial photovoltaics: Technology, applications and economics. doi:10.1049/PBPO107E_ch5
Kumar, N. M., Sudhakar, K., and Samykano, M. (2019). Performance comparison of BAPV and BIPV systems with c-Si, CIS and CdTe photovoltaic technologies under tropical weather conditions. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 13, 100374. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2018.100374
Kurian, J., and Karthi, L. (2021). Building integrated photovoltaics-an overview. Sustain. Agri, Food Environ. Res. 10. doi:10.7770/safer-v10n1-art2495
Kutlu, E. C. (2022). Technical potential of rooftop solar photovoltaic for Ankara. Renewable Energy. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.079
Lai, C. M., and Hokoi, S. (2017). Experimental and numerical studies on the thermal performance of ventilated BIPV curtain walls. Indoor and Built Environment. doi:10.1177/1420326X15611194
Lamnatou, C., Chemisana, D., and Cristofari, C. (2022). Smart grids and Smart technologies in relation to photovoltaics, storage systems, buildings and the environment. Renewable Energy. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.019
Li, H., Cao, C., Feng, G., Zhang, R., and Huang, K. (2015). A BIPV/T system design based on simulation and its application in integrated heating system. Procedia Eng. 121, 1590–1596. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.09.184
Li, J., Zhang, W., He, B., Xie, L., Hao, X., Mallick, T., et al. (2021). Experimental study on the comprehensive performance of building curtain wall integrated compound parabolic concentrating photovoltaic. Energy 227, 120507. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.120507
Liang, R., Wang, P., Zhou, C., Pan, Q., Riaz, A., and Zhang, J. (2020). Thermal performance study of an active solar building façade with specific PV/T hybrid modules. Energy 191, 116532. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116532
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Liu, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, S., et al. (2021). A comprehensive study of feasibility and applicability of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems in regions with high solar irradiance. J. Clean. Prod. 307, 127240. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127240
Lu, L., and Law, K. M. (2013). Overall energy performance of semi-transparent single-glazed photovoltaic (PV) window for a typical office in Hong Kong. Renew. Energy 49, 250–254. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.021
Lydon, G. P., Hofer, J., Svetozarevic, B., Nagy, Z., and Schlueter, A. (2017). Coupling energy systems with lightweight structures for a net plus energy building. Appl. Energy 189, 310–326. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.110
Makinde, K. A., Adewuyi, O. B., Amole, A. O., and Adeaga, O. A. (2021). Design of grid-connected and stand-alone photovoltaic systems for residential energy usage: A technical analysis. J. Energy Res. Rev. 34–50. doi:10.9734/jenrr/2021/v8i130203
Martín-Chivelet, N., Gutiérrez, J., Alonso-Abella, M., Chenlo, F., and Cuenca, J. (2018). Building retrofit with photovoltaics: Construction and performance of a BIPV ventilated façade. Energies 11, 1719. doi:10.3390/en11071719
Martín-Chivelet, N., Polo, J., Sanz-Saiz, C., Núñez Benítez, L. T., Alonso-Abella, M., and Cuenca, J. (2022). Assessment of PV module temperature models for building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV). Sustain. Switz. 14, 1500. doi:10.3390/su14031500
Mellit, A. (2020). Advanced methods for photovoltaic output power forecasting: A review. Switzerland: Applied Sciences. doi:10.3390/app10020487
Mesloub, A., Albaqawy, G. A., and Kandar, M. Z. (2020). The optimum performance of building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) Windows under a semi-arid climate in Algerian office buildings. Sustain. Switz. 12, 1654. doi:10.3390/su12041654
Monokroussos, C., Gao, Q., Zhang, X., Lee, E., Wang, Y., Zou, C., et al. (2020). Rear-side spectral irradiance at 1 sun and application to bifacial module power rating. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 28, 755–766. doi:10.1002/pip.3268
Muehleisen, W., Loeschnig, J., Feichtner, M., Burgers, A., Bende, E., Zamini, S., et al. (2021). Energy yield measurement of an elevated PV system on a white flat roof and a performance comparison of monofacial and bifacial modules. Renew. Energy 170, 613–619. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.015
Myong, S. Y., and Jeon, S. W. (2016). Efficient outdoor performance of esthetic bifacial a-Si: H semi-transparent PV modules. Appl. Energy 164, 312–320. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.063
Najafi, M., Theelen, M., Fledderus, H., Zhang, D., Zardetto, V., van Aken, B., et al. (2022). Light-soak stable semitransparent and bifacial perovskite solar cells for single-junction and Tandem architectures. Sol. RRL 6, 2100621. doi:10.1002/solr.202100621
Oliveira, R., Almeida, R. M., Figueiredo, A., and Vicente, R. (2021). A case study on a stochastic-based optimisation approach towards the integration of photovoltaic panels in multi-residential social housing. Energies 14, 7615. doi:10.3390/en14227615
Omar, A. I., Khattab, N. M., and Abdel Aleem, S. H. E. (2022). ‘Optimal strategy for transition into net-zero energy in educational buildings: A case study in El-Shorouk city, Egypt. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101701
Panagiotidou, M., Brito, M. C., Hamza, K., Jasieniak, J. J., and Zhou, J. (2021). Prospects of photovoltaic rooftops, walls and Windows at a city to building scale. Sol. Energy 230, 675–687. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.060
Pandey, A. K. (2016). Recent advances in solar photovoltaic systems for emerging trends and advanced applications. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.043Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Peng, C., Huang, Y., and Wu, Z. (2011). Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) in architectural design in China. Energy Build. 43, 3592–3598. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.032
Pérez-Alonso, J., Pérez-García, M., Pasamontes-Romera, M., and Callejón-Ferre, A. (2012). Performance analysis and neural modelling of a greenhouse integrated photovoltaic system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 4675–4685. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.002
Peters, I. M., Rodriguez Gallegos, C. D., Sofia, S. E., and Buonassisi, T. (2019). The value of efficiency in photovoltaics. Joule 3, 2732–2747. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.028
Rabani, M., Bayera Madessa, H., and Nord, N. (2021). Achieving zero-energy building performance with thermal and visual comfort enhancement through optimization of fenestration, envelope, shading device, and energy supply system. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101020
Radmehr, M., Willis, K., and Kenechi, U. E. (2014). A framework for evaluating WTP for BIPV in residential housing design in developing countries: A case study of North Cyprus. Energy Policy 70, 207–216. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.041
Ramos, S., Foroozandeh, Z., Soares, J., Tavares, I., Faria, P., and Vale, Z. (2021). Shared PV production in energy communities and buildings context. Renew. Energy Power Qual. J. 19, 459–464. doi:10.24084/repqj19.318
Reddy, P. (2020). Status of BIPV and BAPV system for less energy-hungry building in India-a review. Switzerland: Applied Sciences. doi:10.3390/app10072337
Religiana, H., and Wiyantara, W. (2014). “Analysis on the application of PV technology in terms of tranditional roof house. Case study: Julang ngapak Sundanese traditional roof form,” in Advanced materials research. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.1066
Ritzen, M. J. (2019). Carrying capacity based environmental impact assessment of Building Integrated Photovoltaics. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2018.12.006Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments
Rounis, E. D., Athienitis, A. K., and Stathopoulos, T. (2021). BIPV/T curtain wall systems: Design, development and testing. J. Build. Eng. 42, 103019. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103019
Russo, J. (2012). “Characterization of diffuse anisotropic illumination effects to the output of bifacial and holographic planar concentrating photovoltaic panel configurations,” in Conference record of the IEEE photovoltaic Specialists Conference. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2012.6317842
Saadon, S., Gaillard, L., Giroux-Julien, S., and Ménézo, C. (2016). Simulation study of a naturally-ventilated building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) envelope. Renew. Energy 87, 517–531. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.016
Sabry, A. H., Hasan, W. Z. W., Kadir, M. A., Radzi, M. A. M., and Shafie, S. (2017). Photovoltaic-powered Smart home system with direct current-environment. J. Comput. Theor. Nanosci. 14, 4158–4173. doi:10.1166/jctn.2017.6882
Sabry, A. H., Hasan, W. Z. W., Kadir, M. A., Radzi, M. A. M., and Shafie, S. (2018). Wireless monitoring prototype for photovoltaic parameters. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 11 (1), 9–17. doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v11.i1.pp9-17
Sabry, Y. H., Hasan, W. Z. W., Sabry, A. H., Kadir, M. Z. A. A., Radzi, M. A. M., and Shafie, S. (2018). Measurement-based modeling of a semitransparent CdTe thin-film PV module based on a Custom neural network. IEEE Access 6, 34934–34947. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848903
Sahu, P. K., Roy, J. N., Chakraborty, C., and Sundaram, S. (2021). A new model for estimation of energy extraction from bifacial photovoltaic modules. Energies 14, 5089. doi:10.3390/en14165089
Salimzadeh, N., and Hammad, A. (2017). “High-level framework for GIS-based optimization of building photovoltaic potential at urban scale using BIM and LiDAR,” in International Conference on sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Methodology. Proceedings of the International Conference on sustainable Infrastructure 2017. doi:10.1061/9780784481196.012
Salimzadeh, N., Vahdatikhaki, F., and Hammad, A. (2020). Parametric modeling and surface-specific sensitivity analysis of PV module layout on building skin using BIM. Energy Build. 216, 109953. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109953
Samarasinghalage, T. I., Wijeratne, W. P. U., Yang, R. J., and Wakefield, R. (2022). A multi-objective optimization framework for building-integrated PV envelope design balancing energy and cost. J. Clean. Prod. 342, 130930. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130930
Santoyo-Castelazo, E., Solano-Olivares, K., Martínez, E., García, E., and Santoyo, E. (2021). Life cycle assessment for a grid-connected multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system of 3 kWp: A case study for Mexico. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128314. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128314
Saretta, E., Bonomo, P., and Frontini, F. (2020). A calculation method for the BIPV potential of Swiss façades at LOD2.5 in urban areas: A case from Ticino region. Sol. Energy 195, 150–165. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.062
Schneider, A., van Aken, B., Prakash, J., Fakhfouri, V., Sheng, K. Y., Halm, A., et al. (2018). “Bifacial modules: Design options, characterisation and reliability,” in Bifacial photovoltaics: Technology, applications and economics. doi:10.1049/PBPO107E_ch3
Shankar, A., Vijayakumar, K., and Babu, B. C. (2021). Energy saving potential through artificial lighting system in PV integrated Smart buildings. J. Build. Eng. 43, 103080. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103080
Shanmugavalli, K. R., and Vedamuthu, R. (2021). Solar energy and its estimated contribution to the energy demand of residential apartments in India through their envelopes: A technical and commercial approach. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Util. Environ. Eff., 1–16. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1859009
Shimoda, Y., Sugiyama, M., Nishimoto, R., and Momonoki, T. (2021). Evaluating decarbonization scenarios and energy management requirement for the residential sector in Japan through bottom-up simulations of energy end-use demand in 2050. Appl. Energy 303, 117510. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117510
Shoukry, I., Berrian, D., Libal, J., and Haffner, F. (2018). “Simulation models for energy yield prediction of bifacial systems,” in Bifacial Photovoltaics: Technology, Applications and Economics. Stevenage, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). doi:10.1049/PBPO107E_ch4
Singh, D., Chaudhary, R., and Karthick, A. (2021). Review on the progress of building-applied/integrated photovoltaic system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 47689–47724. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15349-5
Sivaram, P. M., Mande, A. B., Premalatha, M., and Arunagiri, A. (2020). Investigation on a building-integrated passive solar energy technology for air ventilation, clean water and power. Energy Conv. Manag. 211, 112739. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112739
Skandalos, N., and Karamanis, D. (2021). An optimization approach to photovoltaic building integration towards low energy buildings in different climate zones. Appl. Energy 295, 117017. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117017
Song, Z., Li, C., Chen, L., and Yan, Y. (2022). Perovskite solar cells go bifacial—Mutual benefits for efficiency and durability. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106805. doi:10.1002/adma.202106805
Sun, J., Zuo, Y., Sun, R., and Zhou, L. (2021). Research on the conversion efficiency and preparation technology of monocrystalline silicon cells based on statistical distribution. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 47, 101482. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101482
Sun, Y., Liu, D., Flor, J. F., Shank, K., Baig, H., Wilson, R., et al. (2020). Analysis of the daylight performance of window integrated photovoltaics systems. Renew. Energy 145, 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.061
Sunpreme’s ‘Maxima’ bifacial modules offer 380W and impedance matching performance. PV Tech (2022). ‘Maxima’ bifacial modules offer 380W and impedance matching performance. PV Tech. Available at: https://www.pv-tech.org/sunpremes-maxima-bifacial-modules-offer-380w-and-impedance-matching-perform/ (Accessed: November 26, 2022).
Susan, (2021). Optimization of BIPV based on electrical energy generated and return of investment. ARTEKS J. Tek. Arsit. doi:10.30822/arteks.v6i3.1103
Susan, S., and Wardhani, D. (2020). Building integrated photovoltaic as GREENSHIP’S on site renewable energy tool. Results Eng. 7, 100153. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100153
Tablada, A. (2018). Design optimisation of productive Façades: Integrating photovoltaic and farming systems at the tropical technologies laboratory. doi:10.3390/su10103762Sustain. Switz.
Tarigan, E. (2018). Simulation and feasibility studies of rooftop PV system for University campus buildings in Surabaya, Indonesia. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. doi:10.20508/ijrer.v8i2.7547.g7377
Tina, G. M. (2020) ‘A novel building ventilated façade with integrated bifacial photovoltaic modules: Analysis of the electrical and thermal performances’, in 2020 5th International Conference on Smart and sustainable technologies, SpliTech. doi:10.23919/SpliTech49282.2020.9243810
Tina, G. M., Scavo, F. B., Aneli, S., and Gagliano, A. (2021). Assessment of the electrical and thermal performances of building integrated bifacial photovoltaic modules. J. Clean. Prod. 313, 127906. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127906
Ul-Haq, A., Alammari, R., Iqbal, A., Jalal, M., and Gul, S. (2020). Computation of power extraction from photovoltaic arrays under various fault conditions. IEEE Access 8, 47619–47639. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978621
Uzum, B. (2021). Rooftop solar pv penetration impacts on distribution network and further growth factors—a comprehensive review. doi:10.3390/electronics10010055Electron. Switz.
Vuong, E., Kamel, R. S., and Fung, A. S. (2015). “Modelling and simulation of BIPV/T in EnergyPlus and TRNSYS,” in Energy Procedia. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.354
Wang, H., Meng, K., Dong, Z. Y., Xu, Z., Luo, F., and Wong, K. P. (2015). A MILP approach to accommodate more Building Integrated Photovoltaic system in distribution network. IEEE Power Energy Soc. General Meet. doi:10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286173
Wang, M., Peng, J., Yang, H., Wang, C., Li, X., and Lu, T. (2017). Comparison of energy performance between PV double skin facades and PV insulating glass units. Appl. Energy 194, 148–160. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.019
Wittkopf, S., Valliappan, S., Liu, L., Ang, K. S., and Cheng, S. C. J. (2012). Analytical performance monitoring of a 142.5kW p grid-connected rooftop BIPV system in Singapore. Renew. Energy 47, 9–20. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.034
Xu, J., Liu, Y., and Wu, Y. (2021). Automatic Defect Inspection for monocrystalline solar cell interior by Electroluminescence image self-comparison method. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–11. doi:10.1109/TIM.2021.3096602
Yan, X., Wang, E. C., Chen, N., Zhang, L., Gong, X., Zhang, X., et al. (2019). Investigation of phosphorus diffused back surface field (BSF) in bifacial nFAB solar cells. Sol. Energy 179, 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.052
Yang, L. (2011). “High efficiency screen printed bifacial solar cells on monocrystalline CZ silicon,” in Progress in photovoltaics: Research and application. doi:10.1002/pip.1018s
Yang, T., and Athienitis, A. K. (2014). A study of design options for a building integrated photovoltaic/thermal (BIPV/T) system with glazed air collector and multiple inlets. Sol. Energy 104, 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.049
Yin, H. M., Yang, D., Kelly, G., and Garant, J. (2013). Design and performance of a novel building integrated PV/thermal system for energy efficiency of buildings. Sol. Energy 87, 184–195. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.10.022
Yin, H., Zadshir, M., and Pao, F. (2022). “Perspectives of the current, emerging, and future BIPVT technologies,” in Building integrated photovoltaic thermal systems. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821064-2.00008-0
Yoo, S. H., and Manz, H. (2011). “Available remodeling simulation for a BIPV as a shading device,” in Solar energy materials and solar cells. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2010.02.015
Yu, G., Yang, H., Yan, Z., and Kyeredey Ansah, M. (2021). A review of designs and performance of façade-based building integrated photovoltaic-thermal (BIPVT) systems. Appl. Therm. Eng. 182, 116081. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116081
Yu, H., Wang, Q., Lu, C., and Wei, C. (2015). “The research on a new type of BIPV modules constructed by thin-film photovoltaic panel (or module)/PU/color organic-coated steel plate,” in 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) ( IEEE ), 1–6.
Zahedi, A. (2006). Solar photovoltaic (PV) energy; latest developments in the building integrated and hybrid PV systems. Renew. Energy 31, 711–718. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2005.08.007
Zhang, Y., Yu, Y., Meng, F., and Liu, Z. (2020). Experimental investigation of the shading and Mismatch effects on the performance of bifacial photovoltaic modules. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 10, 296–305. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2949766
Zhao, O., Zhang, W., Xie, L., Wang, W., Chen, M., Li, Z., et al. (2022). Investigation of indoor environment and thermal comfort of building installed with bifacial PV modules. Sustain. Cities Soc. 76, 103463. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103463
Zhou, B. (2021). A review on solar pavement and photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.102753
Zhou, Y. (2022). A comprehensive workflow for high resolution 3D solar photovoltaic potential Mapping in Dense urban environment: A case study. Campus of Delft University of Technology’. doi:10.1002/solr.202100478
Zogou, O., and Stapountzis, H. (2011). Energy analysis of an improved concept of integrated PV panels in an office building in central Greece. Appl. Energy 88, 853–866. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.023
Zomer, C., Custódio, I., Antoniolli, A., and Rüther, R. (2020). Performance assessment of partially shaded building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems in a positive-energy solar energy laboratory building: Architecture perspectives. Sol. Energy 211, 879–896. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.026
Keywords: building-integrated PVs, energy yields, energy optimization analysis, PV installation modeling, reliability
Citation: Abojela ZRK, Desa MKM and Sabry AH (2023) Current prospects of building-integrated solar PV systems and the application of bifacial PVs. Front. Energy Res. 11:1164494. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1164494
Received: 12 February 2023; Accepted: 03 April 2023; Published: 20 April 2023.
Tao Zhang, Shanghai University of Electric Power, China
Bin Zhao, University of Science and Technology of China, ChinaAmjad Humaidi, University of Technology, Iraq, IraqAbidaoun Hamdan, University of DIYala, Iraq
Copyright © 2023 Abojela, Desa and Sabry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
This article is part of the Research Topic
Advanced Solar Utilization and Control Technologies in Buildings